Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • RSS Feed


  • Tax Hike Wall of Shame























    Right Michigan Multimedia

    MORE...

    3 MI Pro-Life, Republican Congressmen Unfairly Targeted by Leftist Catholic Coalition This Week


    By Andrew Shirvell, Section News
    Posted on Thu Oct 18, 2007 at 01:28:46 AM EST

    This past week, a leftist Catholic coalition began a crusade against three of Michigan's most reliably pro-life Congressmen: Tim Walberg (representing the 7th Congressional District), Thad McCotter (representing the 11th Congressional District), and Joe Knollenberg (representing the 9th Congressional District). The coalition is composed of local members from Catholics United, Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, and Pax Christi - all groups that have taken a militant anti-Iraq war position.

    So what's their beef with the aforementioned pro-life Congressmen?  

    According to a press release from Catholics United, the coalition is upset that these Congressmen oppose the expansion of SCHIP (the State Children's Health Insurance Program), which is, in part, under the control of the federal government.  See:  http://www.catholics-united.org/?q=node/123  

    Catholics United boldly declares that these Congressmen have "compromised their pro-life voting records" by voting to oppose Democratic efforts last month to broadly expand the program's coverage (an expansion that relies upon a very questionable financing scheme involving revenues from tobacco taxes that may never materialize).  President Bush vetoed the SCHIP legislation on October 3, 2007.  

    As of this writing, Congress is expected to attempt an over-ride of the President's veto today, October 18, 2007.  

    Hence, this past week, the coalition of Catholic leftists has been running radio ads on Christian stations throughout Michigan in an attempt to have Congressmen Walberg, McCotter, and Knollenberg change their position and support the over-ride.  The coalition has also been urging supporters to contact the three federal legislators' offices via e-mail, and, in general, the leftist groups have been making a stink in the mainstream and internet press.      

    So that's the skinny about what's been going on.  And now here is why I am really outraged about it!

    Supporting the right to life of innocent unborn children and supporting the expansion of SCHIP are NOT morally equivalent.  What Catholics United et al have attempted to do this past week is to take their misapplication of Catholic Social Teaching, as they have time and time again, in order to support their thinly-veiled partisan agenda in support of the Democratic Party.  

    What this coalition does not deliberately comprehend is that there are certain moral issues, such as abortion on demand, euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research, etc. that one is morally obliged to take a certain position on in the public arena because they concern INTRINSICALLY EVIL acts, and are, hence, NON-NEGOTIABLE.  That is, under authoritative Catholic Social Teaching, one is morally obliged to ALWAYS oppose these intrinsically evil acts as a matter of public policy.    

    However, Catholic Social Teaching does permit one to take differing positions on issues that call for prudential judgments, and these issues often times do have moral implications.  But the debate over the expansion of SCHIP does not implicate intrinsically evil acts in the same way that, say, the debate over taxpayer funding of abortion undoubtedly does.

    The recent radio ads trying to conflate the NON-NEGOTIBALE issue of opposing abortion rights with the prudential policy judgment of whether to expand SCHIP (under the current Democratic scheme) are way off base:

    "The script for the radio commercial reads: `I'm the mother of three children, and I'm pro-life. I believe that protecting the lives of our children must be our nation's number one moral priority. That's why I'm concerned that Congressman X says he's pro-life but votes against health care for poor children. That's not pro-life. That's not pro-family. Tell Congressman X to vote for health care for children. Call him today at XXXX, that's XXXXX.'" See: http://www.catholics-united.org/schip-ads

    As the Detroit News recently reported, the Congressmen actually support SCHIP, but they have made a prudential judgment that they cannot support expanding the program because in its currently proposed legislative form it is untenable:

    "Spokesmen for both Knollenberg and Walberg said Friday that they support SCHIP, which provides health insurance for children in low-income families, and seek to extend its funding. But they say they oppose the Democratic scheme to finance an expansion of the program."  See: http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071013/POLITICS/710130325/1041/LIFESTYLE04

    Even my Congressman, Tim Walberg, an ordained Protestant minister and obviously not Catholic, recognizes what the application of authentic Catholic Social Teaching is emphatically clear about: health care for the least among us in society is a public good, but one can legitimately disagree on how to best achieve that public good.  

    Thus, in contrast to Catholics United et al, truly non-partisan Catholic entities, such as the Michigan Catholic Conference and the Archdiocese of Detroit, have made sure to distance themselves from the leftist radio spots.  See again:    http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071013/POLITICS/710130325/1041/LIFESTYLE04

    Of course, that hasn't stopped Catholic Democratic partisans in positions of power, even within those entities, from taking-up the cause against three of Michigan's most reliably pro-life (and Republican) Congressmen:

    "`The important thing to communicate to them is that Catholics regard this as an issue of social justice and basic human rights -- this is a life issue,' said Michael Hovey, the director of the Office for Catholic Social Teaching for the Archdiocese of Detroit." See again:    http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071013/POLITICS/710130325/1041/LIFESTYLE04

    Sorry, Mr. Hovey, you're wrong now just as you were in November 2005 when I heard you give a talk at St. Mary Student Parish in Ann Arbor in which you said that the Vatican violated Catholic Social Teaching by opposing the murder of Terri Schiavo.  

    I am sad to see that, two years since I last thought about Mr. Hovey, he still does not grasp the difference between public policy issues with moral implications that call for prudential judgments and moral issues that call for NON-NEGOTIABLE positions.  

    Of course, with this past week's astoundingly misguided radio campaign, Mr. Hovey and his ilk from Catholics United et al appear more eager than ever to take their cues about Catholic Social Teaching from the Democratic Party's talking points rather than from the Vatican.

    About the author: Andrew Shirvell, Esq., is a pro-life citizen activist who writes a weekly column that is published every Thursday for RightMichigan.com in which he focuses upon Michigan pro-life issues. Shirvell attended Ave Maria School of Law - Ann Arbor, where he served as president of the school's Bioethics Society, from 2004-2005.  He also served as president of Students for Life at the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor, from 2000-2002.

    < Granholm's Chief Of Staff Steps Down | Dems angling for second government shutdown in a month! >
    Display: Sort:
    been there done that (none / 0) (#1)
    by geek49203 on Thu Oct 18, 2007 at 08:35:10 AM EST
    My name is Tim W, I'm conservative, I live in the 7th Congressional District, and I'm a former protestant pastor.  

    No, I'm not the Congressman....

    I've seen the liberals in various denominations decry every POTUS and Congress since I've been alive for not being liberal enough.  The same people thought that they were seeing the antiChrist during the Reagan years -- but never bothered to thank him for ending the Cold War.  I remember going to United Methodist gatherings that were simply religious covers for anti-war, anti-nuke, pro-ERA, etc rallies.  

    These groups have a ton of overlap with uber-lib secular groups.  It doesn't surprise me that they've gotten involved with this fiasco as well.

    For the record, 95% of the rest of their respective denominations simply roll their eyes when the libs speak....

    It's all perspective (none / 0) (#2)
    by mikefisk on Thu Oct 18, 2007 at 10:02:00 AM EST
    Some clergy anymore (some in the Catholic Church, but more from the more liberal Protestant denominations like the Episcopalians, Methodists, and Evangelical Lutherans) seem to favor the notion of "social justice" theory, but they get their notions crossed.  

    Jesus wanted our efforts to help those less fortunate to be between us and God, a matter of individual conscience kept close to the heart.  Liberal Christianity seems to advocate the government as the agent for such change, allowing bureaucrats and politicos alike to crow about how much they are helping those "less fortunate" with resources that aren't even theirs.  

    As a result, we have a society that not only rewards coercion and theft, but boasting and acts of deceit in order to gain more "operating revenue".  

    All while these same "social justice" ministers cheer.

    Christian charity this most certainly isn't.

    "To all those whom I have not yet offended: Please stand by, and I will work to remedy the situation as soon as possible."

    Legislating morality (none / 0) (#3)
    by Ed Burley on Thu Oct 18, 2007 at 10:29:19 AM EST
    I am ardently pro-life, and since I believe that abortion is murder I believe that the government has a right to ban it. Murder is against the law.

    However, the idea of social justice in the minds of the liberals is simply the reaction of the social justice of the conservatives. What I mean by this is that we have conservatives who demand that prostitution be illegal, drug use be illegal, pornography be illegal, gambling be illegal, etc. The argument goes that if the church, through the agency of the government can control consensual sin, so the church can also mandate "good" through the government.

    IF we can mandate righteous behavior, why not obligatory giving, mandatory compassion? This is where the argument comes into play.

    The only answer to this dilemma is to cease making the government an agency of the Church. Once that occurs, government can get back to its constitutional duties of protecting its citizens from violence; whether domestic or foreign. Otherwise, we have bureaucrats handing out money, cops arresting sinners, and the military nation-building. Those are not the functions of government.

    Truly Non-Partisan? (none / 0) (#5)
    by Lawdog on Thu Oct 18, 2007 at 06:16:13 PM EST
    I agree that the Archdiocese of Detroit and the Michigan Catholic Conference are usually non-partisan, but calling them "truly non-partisan" is a bit of a stretch.  Recall that the AOD and the MCC joined One United Michigan, the anti-Proposal 2 umbrella organization, aligning themselves with a large number of exceedingly partisan organizations, including the ACLU, the Detroit Democratic Socialists of America, Planned Parenthood(!), and the Triangle Foundation.  No matter how you view these organizations and their missions, they are not non-partisan.

    Moreover, the Detroit News on 10-13 quotes the following:  "'The important thing to communicate to them is that Catholics regard this as an issue of social justice and basic human rights -- this is a life issue,'" said Michael Hovey, the director of the Office for Catholic Social Teaching for the Archdiocese of Detroit."  

    Later in the same article:  "Neither the archdiocese nor the Michigan Catholic Conference, the political arm of the church in the state, is participating in the campaign, said Ned McGrath, a spokesman for the Archdiocese of Detroit."

    Huh?  So the archdiocese is not participating in the campaign, but the Office for Catholic Social Teaching for the Archdiocese of Detroit is?  What gives?

    This (continued?) leftward drift of our institutions, while nothing new, is still depressing and does not bode well for a future in which some of us would like to see some kind of moral authority emanating from the Church.
    Good law, bad law, it's the law.

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Join the RightMichigan.com Facebook Group HERE!
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search