Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • RSS Feed


  • Tax Hike Wall of Shame























    Right Michigan Multimedia

    MORE...

    Inclusion or Indoctrination?


    By amanda zaluckyj, Section News
    Posted on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 09:42:32 AM EST

    I'm not usually a big fan of our school newspaper. Typically, I don't like reading about how I should support a woman's right to choose, how awesome the liberal faculty is, or how naïve conservatives are about the world.

    This week's edition of the paper, however, blew me away (no governor's pun intended). The "Laker Life" section is chalk full of what GVSU wants to preach to students. I know that Grand Valley, and most universities for that matter, want to push diversity, affirmative action, and "inclusion," but when does it go too far?

    Click here, here or here to see what I'm talking about.

    I'm referring to events such as the third annual drag show. Unfortunately, I missed this year's (and the last two years). According to the news article, "Most of the performers from the show have been dressing in drag for years, while a few have only just begun. They are all a part of PowerDiva Productions, a production company that promotes the drag community."

    Seriously? Are you kidding me?

    I am so glad that GVSU had to raise my tuition so that they could help pay for the drag show, put on by a bunch of confused kids who want to play dress up. The very idea that a university, which is supposed to be a place of higher learning, would dish out money to promote and present a drag show is unthinkable.

    I understand that people have unique backgrounds and do believe we should celebrate differences, provided that we also cultivate a national identity once in a while. On the other hand, universities consistently stress these differences and push them on unwary students. The programs are typically biased to promote a particular view of the world.

    Is the school paying for pro-life speakers to discuss the physical and mental harm an abortion causes to a woman? Are they hosting panels to promote smaller government and lower taxes versus socialized health care and welfare programs? Or hiring professors that will condemn illegal immigration?

    The answer to all of the above is mostly no.

    The ironic thing is, universities lobby for more and more of the state's limited budget, which comes from taxpayers of all ideological backgrounds. Yet schools don't want to take the time and promote different points of view.

    Shouldn't taxpayers have a say in how their hard earned money is spent? Such as the passage of the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative which was supposed to end affirmative action policies at our state funded schools. Instead of listening to voters, schools choose to find other ways to accomplish the same goals. At GVSU, the Office of Multicultural Affairs receives a quarter of a million dollars and only benefits certain students. And during the budget crisis, schools across the state bused unsuspecting students to the capital to rally behind higher taxes, despite the majority of Michiganders standing against this increase.

    Why is there such a disconnect between higher education and the world of hard working moms and dads? What is wrong with school administrators? I thought the more education a person received, the smarter they were supposed to be?

    < T-Minus 8 Days and still he fiddles | Portrait of a Tax Hiker: Matt Gillard (D-Alpena) >
    Display: Sort:
    Great article, Amanda (none / 0) (#1)
    by Nick on Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 10:12:24 AM EST
    Thanks!

    Holding them to their words (none / 0) (#2)
    by chetly on Wed Oct 24, 2007 at 12:41:19 AM EST
    Amanda, great general article.  The next step would be doing some research into that Multicultural office on their services to see specifically what they do, or maybe even seeing if they refuse some benefit to you because of skin color, etc.  You're right about the general truth.

    You might find a bona fide preference and therefore violation of Proposal 2. A detailed case study of GVSU's "panels" (show how a specific panel is biased to one side --- panel creation has a special obligation to present some cross-partisan representation because panels are perceived to do that, but I've seen blatantly stack panels all the time).  A specific alternative where you've appealed to the university's leaders to provide balance they refuse (say a pro-choice speaker comes and you ask for a pro-lifer at a separate event, and they refuse). Do that and I assure you win my investigative journalism award ($100), and I can think of a few others out there that might be bigger.

    PS - The more real life a person receives, the smarter they become.  The word for that is wisdom.  "Modern education" both shelters us from real life and acts as an innoculent to it, giving us mostly excuses in place of solutions or methods to deal with reality.  "Good education" teaches process and independent thinking, incorporates "real-life examples" (ever wonder why those fun classes that were more hands-on also worked better too?), and "gets people involved".


    Chetly Zarko
    Outside Lansing & Oakland Politics

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Join the RightMichigan.com Facebook Group HERE!
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search