Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • RSS Feed


  • Tax Hike Wall of Shame























    Right Michigan Multimedia

    MORE...

    Budget farce finally completed, all tricks, no treats as total budget INCREASES


    By Nick, Section News
    Posted on Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 06:49:18 AM EST

    It took them an extra month for the first time in nearly thirty years and this is what they came up with?  Michigan Democrats finally signed off on various departmental budgets in the early hours of Halloween which is fitting because the final result is downright scary.  

    You remember when you were a kid and the sheer excitement you felt every Halloween?  The school parties, all of your classmates in costume and the anticipation... oh the anticipation.  You could survive the school day because you knew as soon as the sun went down you'd be out on the street with your brothers and sisters and friends in your scariest or prettiest or superheroiest costume ever going door-to-door and that the adults had to give you candy.  What an awesome deal.

    But there was always that one house.  There's one on every block.  Someone's always got to give you an apple.  And I always wondered, as a kid, how an adult managed to miss the school lectures that they repeated every Halloween.  You remember them... always inspect your candy and never eat anything that's been tampered with and never, never ever eat anything that isn't completely sealed.  Fresh fruit, friends, is not completely sealed.

    Guess what, apple guy... my parents don't know you, I don't know you and I don't trust your lousy apple.  I know you think you're looking out for my teeth but I just heard that school lecture in class in between a game of 7-UP and the parade of costumes this morning and there is no way I'm taking a chance on biting down into a razor blade or something you injected with poison.

    All the apple guy winds up doing is weighing down your bag and causing you extra frustration when you spill it's contents onto your living room floor looking for a snickers bar.  Sure, he thinks he's helping your teeth, and I'm sure he's perfectly well intentioned (not EVERY apple guy is a psycho killer) but any good parent will refuse to take the chance.

    Well it's Halloween again and Jennifer Granholm and her House Democrats just dropped a really big poisonous apple full or razor blades into our bags.

    Read on...

    Let's take a look at the abomination that is the FY2008 budget.  We've got nearly $1.4 BILLION in job killing tax hikes despite a single-state depression and the highest unemployment rate in the nation at 7.5%.

    We've got business groups, advocacy groups, community groups, anti-tax groups and all sorts of other groups working on either repeals of the new taxes or repeals of legislators' "employed" status through recall campaigns.

    Now we finally have the "cuts" portion of the budget resolved.  "Cuts, revenues and reforms," that's what the Governor kept telling us.  So much for that.  Details are scattered about everywhere this morning... you can check them out at the AP, The Detroit News and the FREEP among others, but when you mix it all up and look at the end product here are the real 2008 budget results:

  • Biggest tax hike in Michigan history.

  • Only government shutdown in Michigan history (while narrowly averting a second).

  • Biggest, most expensive budget in Michigan history.

    That's right.  So much for the cuts.  This is the most expensive budget in Michigan history.  Oh, sure, there's a department here or there that saw a reduction in funding but not nearly enough to cover Governor Granholm's spending increases in other places.  Cut a million here and raise spending forty-million there.

    Michigan Democrats are spending like they've got money to burn.  Our money.  And if it wasn't for a few Senate Republicans like Bill Hardiman demanding specific cuts and privatization of specific services and bucking the governor's veto threats they would have spent more.  

    Is it any wonder residents are ticked off and unwilling to take it anymore?  

    And here's the sad reality for FY2009... when government spending goes up, when you raise taxes on businesses and jobs that are going to leave the state... we're going to be in the same mess next year.  Revenues will not meet expectations.  Every economist in the state will tell you that.  And the fundamental structural spending problem remains completely unchanged.  

    No, that's not true.  It's changed.  They made it worse by spending MORE.  Talk about a poisonous apple.

  • < Major Zarko Research Exclusive: Internal CMU E-mail Leaked | Portrait of a Tax Hiker: Joel Sheltrown (D-West Branch) >
    Display: Sort:
    Budget "cuts" (none / 0) (#1)
    by Ed Burley on Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 08:18:22 AM EST
    Granholm asked for 2.5% increases in education, the legislature gave her 1.0% and called it a "cut." It's been this way in government for ages. I'm not defending these guys, in fact, my gripe about the whole process is that it won't ever change until folks like us actually find some independent candidates who actually understand economics (free market economics at that).

    It's not just Democrats (although they are the MAJOR reason we are so screwed up), it's the Republicans who have their own set of welfare recipients. It's the GOP who won't reconsider their position on marijuana or prostitution. It's the legislators who actually believe that government schools can be improved by spending more money.

    We need FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE; a new way to do business. New legislators need to be sent to Lansing, and Washington as well, who will empower people through small, constitutional government; lower taxes; less regulation. A citizens' right to do what they choose, as long as they do not infringe on the rights, or property of others, must be rediscovered. As long as our politicians who sit in these seats of power believe that THEY are the answer to this society's problems, we'll continue to create these problems.

    Yes, the other 49 states seem to be doing well, while Michigan is in recession. This is not entirely true. They are just ahead of the curve due to the new jobs that were created by the "transplants." As I've said before, what the GOP does is that they get tax cuts pushed through, see an increase in revenues, and they get as excited as Dems to spend the new money. Budgets go up, and up, and up. Then, the day of reckoning comes, when a readjustment occurs, and revenues can't keep up with the increased spending. The "House of Cards" begins to collapse.

    Cutting taxes is always the best decision. This should, however, be followed by MAJOR budget cuts - entire departments; like, Education, Drug Enforcement. Then, as unemployment drops, Social Services can be reduced and then eliminated. Eventually, government will be only doing what they are constitutionally authorized to do, and taxes won't have to be cut anymore, most of them will be able to be eliminated.

    We should start with education and charity. By giving taxpayers a TAX CREDIT on their income tax for every dollar given to charity, or spent on private education, the power of government can be broken and people empowered.

    Things have to change. They just have to.

    Republican Votes (none / 0) (#2)
    by HouseStaffer on Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 10:00:29 AM EST
    It bothers me how many Republicans voted for these budgets.  MIRS reported this morning that on average  each budget bill passed with 88 votes.  How can the GOP justify votes to spend all of that new tax money.  Shouldn't they be voting no because they didn't think we needed this revenue in the first place?

    Does anyone have the list of reps who voted no on all or most of these?  Just from watching the votes I know that reps Hoogendyk, Garfield, Sheen, Meekhof, Palmer, and Agema kept popping up as no votes.  Am I missing any?

    Right On (none / 0) (#4)
    by Calhoun Kid on Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 10:06:18 AM EST
    Ed is right on the money.  The tax hikes happened with almost exclusive Democratic votes with just enough Republicans to come along to allow them to happen.  But these spending increases happened on votes that often had over half the Republicans voting for increased spending and our Senate caucus went along with continuation budgets for the anti-business DEQ and DNR that reflect spending levels that can only be paid for by additional tax increases.  The tricks aren't over yet.  The Legislature is saving more tax increases for Christmas.  Anyone willing to bet
    the 5% pay cuts won't happen?

    Nick, while I've enjoy your Tax Hike Wall of Shame, I'd would like to see it archived for future reference and replace with a Wall of Heros -our dozen or so Republicans who refused to vote for any tax increase and also refused to support any budgets that increased spending over last year.  As much as I dislike tax and spend Democrats, that's to be expected. However tax and spend Republicans and won't tax-but will spend Republicans are even worse.  That final group gave the Democrats on the Wall of Shame a Get-out-of-Recall-Free card.

    The bottom line (none / 0) (#5)
    by Mike in Macomb on Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 10:20:43 AM EST
    So, the bottom line is that the state is spending much more than last year.  There are no "cuts."

    Thanks to Ward, Gaffney, and all the rest of the RINOs for allowing this travesty.  We can't recall these criminals fast enough.

    Well, I'm disgusted. (none / 0) (#8)
    by KG One on Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 10:59:21 AM EST
    Bigger budgets and Republicans voting for higher taxes, can it get any worse than this?

    A $700 million dollar increase over the previous year's budget???

    Holding spending flat would've eliminated the "need" for an income tax hike.

    Can someone tell me what is the difference is now between a Republican and a democrat in Lansing?

    I sure can't.


    I'll second that as well... (none / 0) (#9)
    by KG One on Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 11:06:21 AM EST
    ...we need someone to hold up as an example of what our elected officials should emulate.

    Im so... (none / 0) (#10)
    by Brokeinmacomb on Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 11:46:54 AM EST
    Im so utterly disgusted and appauled by the political stupidity in Lansing I'm Numb. But dont get me wrong, The pen is mightier then the sword..and this case email...

    A Wall of Heroes (none / 0) (#11)
    by Ed Burley on Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 12:48:09 PM EST
    is NECESSARY. If you folks who are ardent GOP supporters hope to get anyone re-elected, we need a list of folks we can vote for. Right now, even though I was labelled a troll for saying so, my comments early on in my adventure here about Republicans, is being echoed by others on this site. Did I not say that the GOP had become big spenders? Was I not chastised for it? Was I not labelled for it?

    There is NO conservative party left in America. Now, conservatives exist within the parties (yes, Virginia, there are conservative Democrats - just not in MI), but the GOP's platform is meaningless.

    I have joined the Libertarian Party. Do I think that the LP is the best choice? Hardly. There's plenty wrong with it. But, with the GOP kowtowing to Granholm and her ilk, nay...encouraging her, it's all but meaningless who runs things anymore. We might as well have Democrats in there, who will screw things up so royally that the voters will see progressivism for what it is - Marxism; class warfare. The problem is, as we have found out in the Communist countries in the past, the proletariat becomes poorer and poorer and poorer. Why? Ayn Rand explained it all in Atlas Shrugged. With the Producers being so penalized (or murdered, in the case of China and Russia), there is no one left to produce.

    As in the parable of the Trees, found in Judges 9 of the bible, the productive trees refuse to be king, because their purpose is to produce, not rule. Finally, they ask the most useless tree, the thornbush, to rule; and he accepts. This is so true in politics - the useless rule, while the useful produce.

    When the Useful stop producing, though, it leaves the Useless who rule to begin "producing" (that's called Socialism). Since they are useless, they are unable to produce - and the whole proletariat suffers. The bourgeoise get their comeupance, for sure - greedy buggers. The poor suffer though - because the Useless, the politicians, are unable to create anything. Their tax base is gone, and there is no one to steal from. Unable to produce, or to steal, there is only one choice left - begin killing the masses.

    It begins with the unborn (too late), and moves on to the elderly and infirm (also too late). Those capital criminals who deserve death are preserved, for awhile, because when they are released on society, they will continue the job of eliminating the poor. Evenually, presumably, all that will be left are the Morons, who produce for the sake of producing, rather than for their own rational self-interest. They will work 12-16 hours a day to produce so that the "new bourgeoise" will have plenty to eat. Eventually, it collapses. The only question is whether there'll be any producers left after that (as in Atlas Shrugged), or if they will all be gone (as in China and Russia). If they're all gone, there's not much hope left. Not much hope at all.

    Almost Right (none / 0) (#12)
    by DMOnline on Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 01:26:53 PM EST
    On the whole, I agree with Ed's assessment.

    But I take issue with a couple things.  

    First off, "transplants" to other states didn't create those jobs.  That's putting the cart before the horse.  Those other states (entrepreneurs - not government) created those jobs to which Michiganders flocked because of our sickly employment environment here.

    I could not agree with Ed more about tax cuts and spending cuts.  When tax cuts generate more federal revenue (a rising tide lifts all boats), those surpluses should either generate more tax cuts OR quite literally be locked away to pay for the huge imbalance that will occur in Social Security and Medicare in just a few short years.

    But neither will happen because elected officials of both parties just can't help themselves.  They'll spend and spend and spend - whether they have the money to spend or not.

    DMOnline
    http://both-right.blogspot.com/

    Transplants (none / 0) (#14)
    by Ed Burley on Wed Oct 31, 2007 at 01:51:53 PM EST
    I fully agree with you that ultimately entrepreneurs create the majority of the jobs. My point was that the Transplants (Asian and European automakers who build plants in the U.S.) are replacing the union thugs that have crippled the U.S. auto industry. Those new jobs, created at those transplants, in turn create additional jobs (even in government to a certain extent). Jobs are needed for all sort of things.

    One lie that the Dems started during the Reagan years was that jobs created by such enterprises as McDonalds are somehow not "real jobs." Their ignorance (or willfull LYING) fails to mention the thousands and thousands of jobs in distribution, food preparation, management, accounting, etc. that are high paying and accompany the growth of the "minimum wage" industries.

    No one should despise any business endeavor. What we should despise is government involvement, which then fosters the corporate welfare mentality. IOW, just as in individual welfare, if people believe that they can get something for nothing, they do it - whether individual or corporate.

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Join the RightMichigan.com Facebook Group HERE!
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!

    Related Links

    + the AP
    + The Detroit News
    + FREEP
    + Also by Nick
    create account | faq | search