Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • RSS Feed


  • Tax Hike Wall of Shame


















    House Dems abandoned Michigan on the primary issue, but at least they're not raising our taxes today


    By Nick, Section News
    Posted on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 06:50:11 AM EST

    Not surprisingly the big focus among insiders in Lansing yesterday and today continues to be the long-shot chance of pulling through with a January 15th joint primary and today is another important day in the process.

    Whether the Ingham County Judge had struck down the law establishing the primary or not both the Republican and Democrat parties had November 14th circled on their calendars.  Today is the day by which both the Republicans and the Democrats were / are required to inform the Secretary of State whether or not they will be participating on 1/15.  

    Remember, it was only a week ago before this court ruling that the assumption among Lansing insiders was that Mark Brewer, a staunch backer of big-labor's candidate, John Edwards, would use today's deadline to yank MDP away from the primary and towards party-only caucuses held in homes and union halls much more easily controlled by his union thugs.

    All of a sudden the court steps in, tosses the primary and boom, today's deadline appears a lot more meaningless.  But should the court's decision be overturned, or should the appeals court "stay" the decision, allowing the primary to go forward, what happens today will affect what happens in January.  So what are the party's going to do?  The FREEP reports:

    Tuesday, Michigan Republican Party Chairman Saul Anuzis indicated his continuing faith in the primary's prospects by telling the state that the Jan. 15 election would be the party's official presidential selection process. The Democratic Party is expected to make a similar declaration today, which is the deadline for doing so under the law struck down last week.

    Now wait a second.... Wait just a second.  It's been abundantly clear this entire time that MRP is determined to have a primary so every Michigan voter has a chance to cast a ballot for the candidate of their choice.  And they haven't removed anyone's name from that ballot, either.  But the state Democrats, they've been scuffling their feet and attempting to obstruct the process this entire time.  And the Associated Press indicates that the contents of their letter to the Secretary of State are actually far from known:

    Wednesday was supposed to be the day by which the Michigan Republican and Democratic chairmen had to tell the secretary of state whether they were going to go ahead with the primary or switch to caucuses or party conventions to nominate their presidential favorites. With the law in limbo, that deadline is meaningless.

    Nonetheless, state GOP Chairman Saul Anuzis sent a letter to the secretary of state Tuesday saying Republicans plan to choose their national convention delegates through the Jan. 15 presidential primary. The party could hold a Jan. 26 presidential convention if the primary doesn't occur.

    Democrats plan to file their own letter Wednesday with the secretary of state, but party spokesman Jason Moon declined to say Tuesday what the letter will contain.

    Why wouldn't Moon talk about the letter the day before it's being filed?  There's only one possible reason... they still don't know what it's going to say.  Brewer is working and pushing hard behind the scenes to fortify his anti-primary, pro-Edwards caucus preference but he's getting push back from folks like Carl Levin and Debbie Dingell who've been staunch primary supporters.  

    Conspicuous by her absence in the entire process is Governor Granholm.

    Read on...

    Where does she stand?  What's she asking Mark Brewer to do?  Are they at each other's throats again?  Don't forget, it was Granholm who attempted to fire Brewer after her election in 2002 and succeeded in splitting control of MDP between Mark and her guy, ultra-lefty Butch Hollowell.  

    My guess is that there are a lot of uneasy moments passing between the chair and the governor right now.  

    Don't forget... in the end this entire process is little more than a proxy fight for Michigan Democrats.  The Governor wants Hillary Clinton to gain the nomination and with Obama and Edwards yanking their names off the ballot earlier this year a primary would likely go to Hillary in a walk.  Brewer's shilling for Edwards and knows he has the union muscle (literally) to intimidate (literally) caucus attendees into supporting The Haircut.  

    Caught up in the middle of these ridiculous Democrat games are the Michigan voters.  Millions of us.  But hey, who cares if you disenfranchise millions... no big deal.  Just another day at the office.  

    Meanwhile team MRP and the Republican field continues to perform admirably working every angle to make the primary happen.  When the Democrats blocked a legislative fix in the Senate and cancelled session this week in the House to avoid the same fix this thing looked dead in the water.  But Saul and the Republicans aren't taking it lying down.  They've got the lawyers working overtime on appeals and requests for a "stay" of the ruling, the AG has filed emergency papers with the courts and they're acting, preparing and filing paperwork to indicate they expect victory.

    And that's something Michigan could use a lot of these days.  Just like yesterday, elsewhere in the papers we've got another round of good news / bad news.

    The latest foreclosure figures are out and the good news is Michigan's biggest city isn't the worst in the United States.  Nope.  Detroit is second worst.  The AP reports:

    The Detroit metro area, which includes Livonia and Dearborn, reported 25,708 filings on 16,079 homes, up more than 93 percent from the same quarter last year. It had the third-highest number of filings during the quarter.

    Oh, and speaking of Andy Dillon's decision to close up shop for the week, while that puts a serious, likely fatal cramp in the joint-primary's side there's also an upside.  Without the Democrats in Lansing they can't pass any more tax hikes!  Which is significant, because, lets not forget, they're still trying to spike taxes and fees on Michigan outdoorsmen and just as hunting season gets under way.  According to the Detroit News:

    If approved by the Legislature... the fee package would double and triple some hunting, fishing and trapping fees by 2010. As many Michigan deer hunters prepare for opening day, the proposal has become a hot-button issue. Many sportsmen decrying an unfair penalty on one segment of the population; others say they are willing to pony up to support vital programs...

    Some members of Michigan's hunting community recognize the need to fund DNR programs and would normally have no problem paying an extra $15 each year. Yet Michigan's stagnant economy and the recent budget squabbles that resulted in proposed tax hikes have many people feeling less than generous these days.

    Clement Parke, a 65-year-old hunter from Alanson, near Petoskey, is one of those.
    "I would be OK (with an increase) if they were sure to use the money for something that would help hunting," said Parke, who hunts on a family member's property. "But I don't think they will."

    Oh, and that extra $15?  That's the lowest of lowball figures.  The popular figures in the Dem caucus right now seem to indicate a 150% tax hike more on the order of $45.  

    Of course I can hear the left now... `oh, forty-five dollars, that's nothing, big deal, you don't support giving an extra $45 a year to make Michigan the perfect state and peaches and cream and sunshines and rainbows and unicorns fa-la-la.'

    That's always the fall-back.  You're mean if you won't pony up a few extra bucks here or there.  Mean and evil and you like to drown puppies and bite the heads off turtle doves.  But what they constantly forget is that every dollar the state takes, through the coercive us of force, mind you, is a dollar that isn't in the private sector creating jobs and providing for families.  And when you add up all the forty-five dollar checks you wind up with tens of millions sucked right out of Michigan's fragile economy.

    And that, my friends, is mean.

    < Chairman Anuzis Thanks Right Michigan and Updates Activists on MI Prez Primary | Wednesday in the Sphere: November 14 >
    Display: Sort:
    Was "The Fix" In All Along? (none / 0) (#1)
    by DMOnline on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 03:24:14 PM EST
    Disclaimer:  I know before I even begin to type this that I'm sounding paranoid.  That's not my style or reputation.  But there's something about having the rug suddenly pulled out from under the GOP's January 15 primary that just doesn't smell right.

    Nonetheless, state GOP Chairman Saul Anuzis sent a letter to the secretary of state Tuesday saying Republicans plan to choose their national convention delegates through the Jan. 15 presidential primary. <u>The party could hold a Jan. 26 presidential convention if the primary doesn't occur</u>.

    Why do I just instinctively sense that the Michigan Republican Party power brokers wanted a closed convention in which a relative handful of delegates choose our presidential nominee?  That there never was any interest - at least among the state GOP movers and shakers - in allowing we, the people, to make this decision?

    Maybe it's paranoia.  Or maybe it's almost 3 decades of closely observing politics.  But I have a keen sense of BS when I smell it.

    DMOnline

    DM Might be paranoid... (none / 0) (#2)
    by John Galt on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 03:32:08 PM EST
    But that doesn't mean he's wrong.  It doesn't mean he's right, either.  Go with your hunches, though.

    The primaries are specifically for the "political elite".  If you're an independent or a libertarian, you're really not supposed to be voting in the primary.  But I'm just a horrible dis-enfranchiser person.

    I believe that if caucuses are held, that regular joe-Republican can still vote.  If conventions are held, then it starts with precinct delegates and whomever is elected through county conventions.

    But doesn't that make sense?  Start with the most basic involved Republicans, which are voted by the neighborhood Republicans... they go to County Conventions and are nominated to go to State Convention?  

    Why would someone who isn't a Republican be allowed to vote in a Republican primary... for the person THEY want to see run as a Republican?  The primary is for Republicans to elect their nominee.  If you want to be involved in the nominating process, it's not that hard to get involved and become one of the "elite power mongers" voting at the conventions.  It's so easy that I wish more political websites had the information.

    Maybe. Maybe Not. (none / 0) (#3)
    by DMOnline on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 04:51:39 PM EST
    Well, this website would be a fine place to start spreading information on how the rest of us can get involved at that elite level.

    However, I'd prefer a primary in which all Republicans, but only declared Republicans, can vote.  In 2000, there was a significant influx of independents and Democrats who voted in our open primary giving McCain the victory.  Do I think that was right?  No.

    But I also don't think it's right to limit that decision to a handful of elite power brokers.

    My Republican State House Representative said he voted against the January 15 primary because it infringed on people's privacy.  How?  We would have to declare which party we belonged to.  The result?  Selling of mailing lists to political consultants who would then bombard us with more junk mail.  Well, I think that's a small price to pay for the right to vote for my presidential candidate of choice.

    By the way, I don't recall voting for a local delegate to represent me at the county or state Republican convention.  When did that election occur?

    DMOnline

    • DM... by Nick, 11/14/2007 08:56:07 PM EST (none / 0)
    Becoming a Precinct Delegate (none / 0) (#5)
    by John Galt on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 10:31:53 PM EST
    By the way, I don't recall voting for a local delegate to represent me at the county or state Republican convention.  When did that election occur?

    Every even-year election.  Each precinct has at least one delegate.  My congressional district will send about 100 people to the state convention.

    But I also don't think it's right to limit that decision to a handful of elite power brokers.

    It's not exactly a handful.  By my calculation, it's at least 1500-2000 people that make the decision at a convention.

    Well, this website would be a fine place to start spreading information on how the rest of us can get involved at that elite level.

    Well, the info on the MIGOP site is pretty pathetic, but it's a good start.  It'll at least get you elected.  

    Like Nick said, talk to your County and/or Congressional District Chairman (which can be found here).  They can help get you setup.  

    If you want to be an awesome precinct delegate, you can learn from the Demoncrats - there's a good guide here.  Just gloss over the part about the difference between conservatives and liberals... most of the rest is valuable.

    And because it's worth mentioning - the next election for precinct delegate should be August, 2008.  You'll have until May to file the affidavit, and you might not be able to go to the State Convention and nominate the President.

    Colorado PD Guide (none / 0) (#7)
    by John Galt on Thu Nov 15, 2007 at 08:46:02 AM EST
    The link takes you to a form they want you to fill out.

    Just fill it in with useless information... fake email, fake name.

    Then when you submit, it'll let you download the PDF document.  It's about 50 pages long, recommending things like getting voter lists and talking with neighbors to identify the Republicans (and non-Republicans)...

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Join the RightMichigan.com Facebook Group HERE!
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search