Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • RSS Feed


  • Tax Hike Wall of Shame























    Right Michigan Multimedia

    MORE...

    Cutting to the bone: Umm.... not quite yet


    By Nick, Section News
    Posted on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 07:54:11 AM EST

    "We've been cutting for seven years now. If this rhetoric about cutting taxes to business brings more business to the state (were true) we would have seen a turnaround by now," said Lee Parks, a retiree from suburban Lansing. "We're now cutting to the bone."

    --Detroit News, April 18, 2007

    State government has been "cut to the bone."  If you've been paying attention these last, oh, four or five years then you've probably heard this catch phrase more often than you'd like.  It's kind of a gruesome image, isn't it?  It means deep deep cuts have been made.  It means you can't cut any deeper.  You've gone as far as you can go.

    Anytime there's a budget shortfall the left trots this one out and parades it around because it makes a nice sound-byte.  Visit some leftie blogs and do a search.  It's everywhere.  It's seeped into the language of unions, long been a part of the liberal media chorus and has become a pet phrase of activists.  

    And that all makes me wonder, do they even think about what they've said when somehow, miraculously, someone finds wasteful government spending right here in Michigan?  I mean, they do realize that we have a $42 plus billion state budget, right?  And that anytime you're talking about billions with a b then you're talking about a lot of money?  That finding savings and efficiencies in a pot that big is possible without destroying the future of mankind?

    Read on...

    Case in point, Michigan's Supreme Court decided to lead the way themselves (no, the Constitutional obligation to balance the budget still rests on the governor, they were just being nice) yesterday in announcing they'd be giving back their state owned automobiles.

    The Detroit News is reporting this morning that the Granholm administration has jumped on the automobile savings bandwagon and has decided to strip cars from 109 state employees, saving taxpayers up to $182,000 a year!  Now, with the writing on the wall, the State Appeals Court, led by Chief Judge William Whitbeck is expected to give up their automobile privileges saving another $54,000.

    And in the famous words of Rod Roddy... "but wait, there's more!"

    FREEP reports this morning that even more money can be saved by adhering to the proper procedures for washing the state's automobile fleet.  Ladies and gentlemen, I couldn't make this up.  

    Michigan had expected to spend about $700,000 on car washes this year, but that could be cut about $200,000 if a fuel card was used, said a Department of Management and Budget report released Monday. The authors said "significant departure from car wash guidelines" caused the higher costs.

    So lets add it all together.  First the Supreme Court announces they'll give up their state cars.  They're not sure just how much money this will save yet so I'll opt out of including any estimates here.  But the next day the state comes up with $436,000 in savings from car washes and eliminating personal vehicle use for just over 100 employees.  But we've cut to the bone, right?  

    This isn't rocket science.  That money was being wasted.  Taxpayer money.  Your money.  My money.  So every time one of these tax and spenders tells you there's no fat left to trim, just remind them how a single elected official, Cliff Taylor, put an end to a little bit of frivolous spending and it snowballed in the course of a day to nearly a half-million dollars.

    Now, lets talk about MESSA, prison privatization and an elimination of the Office of the First Gentleman (I know... I shouldn't get greedy).

    < FREE BEER - Lansing Blogger Meet up tonight 7 pm | Another failed Democrat candidate, another paycheck at taxpayer expense >
    Display: Sort:
    Why did you ignore his point? (1.00 / 1) (#1)
    by NoviDemocrat on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 10:04:16 AM EST
    We still haven't seen an answer to the question of why the tax-cutting of the late 90s and early 2000s led to an economic bust, not an economic boom that the proponents of those cuts promised.

    and as soon (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by Nick on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 10:23:45 AM EST
    as Governor Granholm abandons tax cuts as a means of attracting businesses I'll concede that you've even got a point worth arguing.

    In the meantime I'll offer a few possible answers...

    Inept leadership in Lansing (see Granholm's recent press conference touting the fact that ONLY 1,400 more employees would lose their jobs thanks to her)

    Failed leadership in Lansing (remember Delphi?)

    A union stranglehold on tax dollars (MESSA anyone?)

    A union first mentality crippling the Big 3 (Why are all of the new auto plants being opened in Right To Work states?)

    And then there's the rest of the United States to consider... giant tax cut in 2001.  Economy goes from bust to boom.  Dow Jones setting records every week it seems as analysts call it one of the longest periods of sustained growth in the history of the market.  3 million plus new jobs everywhere but here.

    48 other states with budget surpluses.

    Etc. etc. etc.

    Now that we've played that game (again), the gentleman's assertion that we've "cut to the bone" couldn't be further from the truth as evidenced by the half million dollars the Supreme Court wound up showing the state yesterday alone.

    she sure packs on the freqeunt flier miles (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by Nick on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 03:28:14 PM EST
    going anywhere and doing anything for a good photo-op.

    it was a twin turb prop (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by Spartyfan on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 04:43:55 PM EST
    She flew her kids on the state owned King Air.

    Here... (none / 0) (#10)
    by Republican Yankee on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 05:11:35 PM EST
    c'mon fellas... (none / 0) (#11)
    by Nick on Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 06:17:03 PM EST
    you don't need to offer the lefties any proof.  They aren't actually trying to call you on anything, they're only stirring it up.

    Remember they tried the same thing with the tax hike question... "oh yeah, well what tax hikes has the Governor pushed if she's such a tax and spender?"

    You show them the list with dozens of proposed hikes and boom... they go quiet.

    No "oh, sorry about that."  Just stirring the pot.  

    oh, burn! (none / 0) (#13)
    by Nick on Wed Apr 25, 2007 at 08:29:46 AM EST
    You called a prop-plane a jet!  That makes a ton of difference.  Changes my entire outlook on the issue.

    you're right (none / 0) (#15)
    by Nick on Wed Apr 25, 2007 at 09:21:08 AM EST
    It wasn't.

    A little defensive, aren't we?

    what (none / 0) (#19)
    by Nick on Wed Apr 25, 2007 at 05:23:31 PM EST
    areas specifically do you disagree with the Governor on and why, Novi?

    Touche'... (none / 0) (#20)
    by Jeremy Nielson on Wed Apr 25, 2007 at 09:02:04 PM EST
    So the Governor doing a Labor Day Parade (like he usually does) is on par with sending your little ankle biters to a slumber party... or taking the family to an out-of-state MSU basketball game?

    I'm glad to see Moral Equivalency.

    Let's not forget that the Governor sold five state aircraft for a cool million bucks in 2005.  But kept her puddle jumper.  

    Do not as we say... But do as the Engler's did.  Because they did it makes it perfectly right when the state's in a "budget crisis".

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Join the RightMichigan.com Facebook Group HERE!
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search