Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • RSS Feed


  • Tax Hike Wall of Shame


















    The word of the day: E-F-F-I-C-I-E-N-C-Y


    By Nick, Section News
    Posted on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 07:36:33 AM EST

    Two days after the governor's latest temper-tantrum the action continued to come fast and furious in the Michigan Senate while discussion of increased savings and efficiencies even crept out-state to the last place one would ever expect it; Wayne County and the city of Detroit itself!

    For a state that's cut to the bone there sure do seem to be a lot of savings floating around out there and darn it all if Democrats don't keep identifying them.  I guess they didn't get the governor's talking points out-state.

    In the D, for instance, new Detroit Public Schools Superintendent Connie Calloway is preparing to start her tenure helming the state's most beleaguered school district.  Discussion from parents, local officials and electeds all seems to be revolving around the same efficiency theme.  

    Read on...

    The Detroit News reports:

    The system, which is shuttering schools and laying off teachers, also has suffered from recent financial scandals, including millions of dollars in inappropriate wire transfers allegedly sent from a district office. The money woes leave school buildings in disrepair and many students without books to take home for study.

    "It's time to earn back the parents' trust," said Michigan Sen. Wayne Kuipers, chairman of the Senate Committee on Education. "The way you do that is make sure you are running an ethical administration."

    Turns out most parents would prefer text books for their kids rather than overlapping positions in the DPS administration.  Things like paper and pencils also rank awfully high on the list.  

    How these pretty basic priorities seem to get lost between local communities and Lansing is still a little beyond me.  Suppose when you couch it in floury words and tell people the reason their kids don't have books is because of mean Republicans instead of inefficient local administration that could have something to do with it.  At least with DPS parents finally seem more than fed up and ready to demand accountability.  More and more they're voting with their feet and pulling their kids out of the district.

    Meanwhile, a little bit further up the regional food chain Wayne County Executive Robert Ficano is rooting out some savings himself.  The FREEP reports that he's ready to pick up the County operations and move them to a new office complex to avoid paying excessive rent to his current landlord.  

    In a normal commercial office building, tenants pay rent based on the square footage of their space plus a small add-on, usually around 13%, for common-area upkeep. In the current downtown office market, the rental rate for an older building is about $15 per square foot, including expenses, and perhaps $20 or a little higher in newer Class A buildings...

    If all... ceremonial spaces are included, the county is paying about $22 a square foot; if only the office space itself and the normal common-area charge are used, the county is paying around $40 per square foot.

    Either way, the county's rent is well above the going market rate, said Steve Morris, executive managing director of the Farmington Hills-based Newmark Knight Frank, a real estate consulting firm.

    The current building has plenty of historic value, sure, but gouging a tenant is gouging a tenant.  Think Ficano would kill for the $1 a year lease the Michigan State Police are ready to burn by moving into a new headquarters that'll cost taxpayers $5 million?  Something tells me he'd jump at that chance.  

    How these pretty basic priorities seem to get lost between local communities and Lansing is still a little beyond me.  Suppose when you couch it in floury words and tell people the reason you're laying off police and firefighters is because of mean Republicans instead of inefficient money burned paying excessive rent that could have something to do with it.  At least the VERY democrat Wayne County Executive seems more than fed up and ready to make root out inefficiencies in even the most unlikely places.  Moving 500 employees and the county's operations will be no small feat, but it might be the right one.

    So do you suppose maybe the problem is on an entirely different level?  Lets head to Lansing, now, shall we?  Spurred on by the governor to take action before any vacation time the Michigan House and Senate have taken two very different approaches these last few days.  The Senate passed public employee retiree reforms, started moving healthcare reforms and yesterday passed school calendar consolidation.  The House... well... hmm.  They held some hearings and want to let you put docks at the end of lake roads.

    Then again, the Democrats control the House and the Democrats continue to obstruct progress in the Senate.  Maybe that's where the problem lies?  Senate Dems already blocked the MESSA kill this week and yesterday they did their best to prevent local school districts from sharing resources, pooling services and saving cash.  The Associated Press reports:

    Don Wotruba, lobbyist for the Michigan Association of School Boards... said schools have to offer more classes now because of new state high school graduation requirements. So districts are looking to join with other area districts to offer electives along with vocational and special education programs.

    A common calendar for every school in an ISD would help districts share classes, Wotruba said, because there no longer would be back-to-back weeks of students on different breaks.

    A shared calendar would also allow districts to pool more efficiently for items such as busing and janitorial services.  Local school boards seem to understand the power of pooling and increased efficiency.  How does that get lost on its way to Lansing?  

    Well, it doesn't.  Conservatives are moving on these items.  The left continues to block them and refuses to offer up solutions of their own.  There's yet to be a vote on a tax increase in the House despite the governor's insistence that "new revenues" be the cornerstone of any budget fix.  But the Dems continue to blather on and on incessantly about how necessary a massive tax hike is and about how we've cut to the bone.  Democrats locally don't believe that.  Why do they buy it in Lansing?

    < Let's Legalize Mixed Martial Arts (UFC) in Michigan | A Michigan Primary Plan for 2008 >
    Display: Sort:
    Republicans don't support local control? (1.00 / 1) (#1)
    by NoviDemocrat on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 10:05:48 AM EST
    On the one hand you say "Local school boards seem to understand the power of pooling and increased efficiency." Then you turn around and say that a common calendar has to be mandated from Lansing because local schools aren't smart enough to figure that out themselves? You spend a whole page Lansing-bashing and then end it endorsing the legislation that involves Lansing mandating how local schools should be run. A bit contradictory don't you think?

    not at all (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by Nick on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 10:31:41 AM EST
    While I'm typically very sympathetic to the "local control" argument for schools there's also a responsibility not to use local control as a license to burn cash.  Especially when that cash comes from the state.

    You said (1.00 / 1) (#3)
    by NoviDemocrat on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 10:42:03 AM EST
    "Local school boards seem to understand the power of pooling and increased efficiency."

    If you believe that, why does Lansing need to mandate a common calendar? Shouldn't local school districts be able to work that out themselves? Or do you prefer Lansing mandating a solution to every perceived problem?

    and they'd love (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by Nick on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 11:11:14 AM EST
    to save cash by pooling.  A shared calendar will help them do that.  

    It just might not be in the self-interest of an ISD to share calendars.  

    But wait, are you now advocating local control?  So you're on board with the MESSA kill and releasing claims data so locals can collectively bargain for better rates on teacher health insurance?

    Ah, trapped by the "Golden Rule". (none / 0) (#6)
    by John Galt on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 12:17:50 PM EST
    So the negligence of the local school boards is okay?

    I read what you say as "We don't need legislation to fix the problem.  Negligence with the public's finances is OKAY."

    Local Control doctrine is not a blank check for stupidity, corruption, or waste.  True local control would mean that the school districts get their money from their residents, not the state.  So this "more" or "less" local control argument is pretty false.  

    Understanding government means understanding the Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules.

    I prefer (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by Nick on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 01:04:02 PM EST
    the state not burning money.

    Thank you, wise man. (none / 0) (#9)
    by sandmman on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 01:14:25 PM EST
    You're so very ENLIGHTENING.

    Blah, blah, blah, blah

    Can we just start over? (5.00 / 1) (#10)
    by snoopygirlmi on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 03:15:27 PM EST
    Seriously?  

    Get rid of the state and feds running "public education" and let the locals completely do it on their own.  

    Why not?  

    That's how it was done years ago.  You build a town, you build a school, the kids get educated and life goes on.

    If they qualify to go to college and are accepted and can pay for it, then they go.  

    Sometimes companies go out of business and maybe this one just simply has to go because it's not working.  If "educated kids" can't read, there's a huge problem - and it's not with the kids because they don't know any better.  It's with the "grown ups" running the system.  

    Anyway, realizing that my solution is way too radical and would require actual changes-not just band-aids, I'll just take my Prozac and stop "thinking outside the box".  For a moment.

    The irony (1.00 / 1) (#11)
    by NoviDemocrat on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 03:23:43 PM EST
    is that John Engler (Proposal A) and George Bush (No Child Left Behind) are most responsible for stripping local control from our public schools. Explain that from the conservative world view.

    Hey Novi DumocRAT (none / 0) (#12)
    by sandmman on Thu Jun 28, 2007 at 03:53:57 PM EST
    Thanks for your invaluable input.

    Always great to hear from those with limited intelligence.


    You said (none / 0) (#21)
    by NoviDemocrat on Fri Jun 29, 2007 at 09:26:44 AM EST
    "I support big government by limiting the amount of property taxes (and others) that are collected by school districts claiming to be educating our kids.  This in direct contrast to your apparent view that giving schools more money and hence, creating smaller government, will better educate our kids."

    But as you point out yourself, Proposal A had the opposite effect. It didn't limit the amount of money collected and spent on education. In fact, it's increased the amount of money being spent on schools. So from your viewpoint, how can you claim that Proposal A is a success or that it's limited the amount of taxes being collected? There's no evidence, as you claim, that districts would have collected more without Proposal A in place. In fact, historically, it's pretty clear that local taxpayers had more input on school spending before Proposal A than they do now.

    I did say that (none / 0) (#22)
    by Dutchsma on Fri Jun 29, 2007 at 10:03:29 AM EST
    and you must have missed the sarcasm in what I wrote. I am not a fan of big government in any way shape or form.

    Regarding Prop A: Keep in mind that Proposal A gave taxpayers significant relief on their property taxes and that those taxes are significantly lower now than what they would be had the reform not been implemented.  Also remember that schools are not funded solely by property taxes.  The SAF receives revenue from the tobacco tax, the liquor tax, the state lottery, the federal government, the sales and use tax,the real estate transfer tax and several other taxes.  

    Additionally, Prop A limited the rate at which property assessments could increase per year - which has a direct impact on the amount of revenue is generated from property taxes.  According to a study done by the state a few years ago there has been a net tax cut of $17 billion to taxpayers as a result of Prop A.

    http://www.michigan.gov/documents/propa_3172_7.pdf

    All true (1.00 / 1) (#23)
    by NoviDemocrat on Fri Jun 29, 2007 at 01:50:32 PM EST
    but it still doesn't support your claim that any of that has limited the amount of money going to public schools. The opposite has been true with more money going to schools since Proposal A than before. So your position is to support a system that results in 1) More spending on public schools 2) More centralized control of schools through Lansing 3) Less local control over schools 4) Less voter input on how school funds are collected and spent. As I said before, it's a very interesting conservative view of the world.

    More drivel from Novi DumocRAT (none / 0) (#24)
    by sandmman on Fri Jun 29, 2007 at 02:06:43 PM EST


    You forgot the little detail (1.00 / 1) (#26)
    by NoviDemocrat on Fri Jun 29, 2007 at 03:33:30 PM EST
    that it's not legit to compare millage rates pre-Proposal A to now and say that they wouldn't have changed. Millage rates would have rolled back due to Headlee. So it's very unlikely that there would have been anywhere near that difference you stated. Plus, you didn't factor in the massive increase in spending on schools through debt millages which isn't reflected in those numbers.

    Wrong, wrong, and wrong (none / 0) (#28)
    by sandmman on Fri Jun 29, 2007 at 08:44:26 PM EST
    Dutchsma wrote, "Look, I think you may be a well intentioned person but you have to check your facts - seriously."

    Nothing, absolutely NOTHING about Novi DumocRAT is well-intentioned.

    Nothing like trying to treat Novi DumocRAT with undeserved respect - but you'll not change Novi DumocRAT. Novi DumocRAT chooses to remain an ignorant boor.

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Join the RightMichigan.com Facebook Group HERE!
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search