Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • RSS Feed


  • Tax Hike Wall of Shame


















    John Edwards flips Michigan the bird


    By Nick, Section News
    Posted on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 07:29:36 AM EST

    Interesting exchange yesterday between Presidential candidate John Edwards and a group of machinists and aerospace workers.  Allow me to paraphrase...

    John Edwards: I'm telling all Americans to give up their SUVs to help sacrifice and save energy.

    Union worker:  How can you tell us to give up our SUVs when you live in a 28,000-square-foot mansion?

    John Edwards:  I'm a lawyer.

    Union worker:  Oh, ok.  

    Applause

    I couldn't help but want to shout a few follow ups at the man just reading the news report of his little Q & A.  The first would have been, and I quote myself here... "so?"

    The second would have been "how can you ask Americans to sacrifice what they drive to ease your conscience on the environment when you won't sacrifice the $127,000 illegally raised by Dr. Death's now officially indicted legal counsel, Geoff Fieger (allegedly)?"

    Wait, don't tell me.  You're a lawyer.  Got it.  

    This is Mark Brewer's candidate, by the way.  The pick of the chair of the Michigan Democrat Party wants to tell you what you can or can't drive.  And, by extension, he wants to tell the Big 3 what they can and can't sell, attempting to take their most profitable vehicles off the market.

    Just what Michigan needs.

    Read on...

    Lest anyone doubt such a mind boggling conversation actually took place, the Associated Press reports:

    "I think Americans are actually willing to sacrifice," Edwards said during a forum held by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers. "One of the things they should be asked to do is drive more fuel efficient vehicles."

    The former North Carolina senator was asked specifically if he would tell them to give up their SUVS, he said, "Yes."

    ...Edwards was asked during his appearance how he explained the contradiction of asking Americans to sacrifice while he's living in a 28,000-square-foot mansion.

    He said he came from nothing, worked hard all his life, has always supported workers and fought big corporations as a lawyer.

    Of course, as a lawyer, Edwards knows that when the federal government indicts you on multiple counts you're in some hot water.  Still, he refuses to return the illegal (allegedly) campaign cash.  Ethics are, apparently, not quite as important as competing in the cash race with Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.  

    Meanwhile, Fieger-time himself continues the battle against Joe McCarthy, black books and vast rightwing conspiracies.  Not that the judge is buying it.  AP is also reporting the case might just be going to trial.

    A motion seeking to dismiss the charges was filed Tuesday and thrown out shortly afterward by U.S. District Judge Paul D. Borman.

    Fieger and Johnson are charged with conspiracy, causing the Edwards campaign to unwittingly make false statements, making illegal campaign contributions in another's name and making illegal campaign contributions from a corporation.

    Sounds like a winning team, right?  Maybe Edwards would consider Fieger for a potential running mate.  They're both lawyers.  They both like illegal campaign money (allegedly).  And, though Fieger isn't on record just yet supporting an abolition of the sports utility vehicle, I'm sure he'd be willing to issue a statement if Edwards asked nice.

    Then again, maybe TELLING American citizens (not asking, mind you) to give up their SUVs isn't the best way to ingratiate yourself to voters in a state dependant on the struggling automobile industry.  For all the insistence by the radical left in Michigan that the state's economic ills must all be laid at the feet of the big 3 there's a surprising lack of outrage when a candidate for the highest office in the land insists he'll tell Ford, GM and Chrysler to stop producing their most profitable vehicles.

    Not exactly the best way to get the industry back on their feet.  And not exactly the best time to threaten hundreds of thousands of Michigan jobs, most located in and around Detroit, a city virtually tied with Buffalo as the poorest big city in America.

    According to the Detroit Free Press figures released yesterday stick the D with a 28.5% poverty rate.  But that's not the half of it.  

    Poor households in Livingston County jumped 28.7% while other metro Detroit areas saw increases that ranged from 25.1% in Dearborn to 22.3% in Livonia to 69.8% in Canton.

    Nationally, by contrast, the poverty rate declined from 13.1% to 12.7% in 2006 -- the first dip in this decade -- and median household income climbed to $48,451. In 2006, the poverty level for a family of four was an annual income of slightly less than $21,000.

    And while the same story tells us about people like Rich Andrews, a Madison Heights resident and former landscaper who's looking to Nevada for employment, there are thousands more just like him in the region.  

    After 5,000 applied for 350 Walmart jobs in Livonia about a month ago (wait, I thought those were supposed to be the worst jobs in the world... huh...) a job fair yesterday in Clinton Township drew thousands in the first day.  And it'll continue today.  The Detroit News reports:

    Tables overflowed with would-be workers filling out paperwork for security, maintenance, management and sales jobs. Many were forced to sit on the floor to complete their application.

    By the time the first day of the fair was over at 6 p.m. Tuesday, more than 4,000 people had attended, in search of one of the 1,000 jobs that are to be filled before the exclusive mall opens to the public Oct. 18 on M-59 between Garfield and Romeo Plank roads.

    I just hope none of them pulled up in SUVs.

    < Breaking: CMU hired Gary Peters over Ken Sikkema | Michigan Citizen's saying "NO" to Tax Hikes! >
    Display: Sort:
    it's their own problem (none / 0) (#1)
    by goppartyreptile on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 09:37:39 AM EST
    Go out and drive around this state.  Particularly in the really "cool cities".  Saugatuck, Ann Arbor, Traverse City... the whole south end of Oakland County.

    What do you see?

    A Prius with a G4G sticker on it.

    An Outback with a "my body, my choice" sticker on it.

    One of those (japanese) shoebox looking car thingies with "I like your christ, but I don't like your christians" on it.

    A Volvo with "Impeach Bush" next to "worst president ever" next to "think globally, act locally".

    Older model Volkswagons that say "What if the schools had all the money they needed and they had to have a bake sale to build a bomber?" on it.

    See what I mean?  

    For every one BMW you see with a "W" sticker on it, you'll see ten little Japanese or Korean or German cars with all kinds of slogans on them.

    The blue collar side and the hippy side of the democrat coalition need to have a heart to heart.

    They drive from the bookstore that gives out anti Bush yard signs, to the organic food store, to go watch belly dancing, and then off to a rally calling Republicans Nazis in their little imports... and then go home and blog about how we are losing manufacturing jobs in this state to overseas competition. That isn't fair because they pollute the environment. Or don't give generous enough pensions.  (what?)

    I'm a free market guy, but was turned off by Japanese cars after my first extreme displeasure in driving a very old Accord from Detroit to Lansing with a cherry bomb muffler on it.

    Buy what you wish, but don't talk out of both sides of your mouth to prop up your very unwieldy coalition.

    Amazing (none / 0) (#2)
    by gun totin wacko on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 10:10:04 AM EST
    to think that people would let Edwards get away with a statement like that.  What a slime-ball.

    But Feiger won't speak out against SUV's.  When he was running for governor, I recall reading that he was driving around in a Lincoln Navigator.  After all, he's a lawyer.

    Favorite (none / 0) (#3)
    by DMOnline on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 10:31:12 AM EST
    Favorite bumber sticker:

    "Think Whirled Peas"

    DMOnline

    • mine is by goppartyreptile, 08/29/2007 11:42:38 AM EST (none / 0)
    I would think that Nick would be pleased (none / 0) (#5)
    by NoviDemocrat on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 12:36:42 PM EST
    to see incomes declining. He keeps telling state government workers to give up their pay raises, the UAW to give up any thoughts of pay raises and encouraging right-to-work and lower paying jobs as the solution to our economic ills. The Big 3, the Airlines, and others are going to cut costs by cutting pay. Sounds like we're heading in the right direction if you follow the Republican plan for economic success.

    • Personally by mikefisk, 08/29/2007 02:55:02 PM EST (none / 0)
    Oh, that was clever (none / 0) (#6)
    by Nick on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 02:08:21 PM EST
    I like that.  You ignored the story and went off on your own tangent.  Clever.  I think that's called "controlling the message."  Good effort!

    Don't read your own postings? (none / 0) (#8)
    by NoviDemocrat on Wed Aug 29, 2007 at 03:26:19 PM EST
    I was just responding to the comments about declining income.

    Maybe it's off topic in this thread but I think it's a debate that needs to take place. Let's face it, Republicans keep bleating on about needing to cut costs to make government, industry, etc. competitive with [fill-in-the-blank - i.e. Indiana, Alabama, Mexico, China, etc.] For most organizations, the biggest cost is salaries and benefits. So for the US or Michigan to be competitive, we either invest to become more productive (through technology for example) or we cut wages and benefits.

    From everything I've heard, Republicans want to go the cut wages and benefits route. You've heard it here. Want to reduce the cost of government? Ask employees to take less money and pay more for benefits. Want to reduce the cost to build a car? Ask employees to take less money and pay more for benefits (or take less benefits period). The Wal-Marts of the world are applauded because of their ability to hold down costs (wages) and creating their own market because the people who work their can't afford to shop anywhere else. It's a nasty circle of declining incomes for the working class (and more of the middle class). I'm sure you'll cry "class warfare" but you would be better off asking if your race for the bottom is good for America.  

    Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain! (none / 0) (#9)
    by KG One on Thu Aug 30, 2007 at 08:43:49 PM EST
    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Join the RightMichigan.com Facebook Group HERE!
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search