![]() |
NAVIGATION
|
![]() RightMichigan.com |
A little spending sanity please?By Nick, Section News
There's been so much going on with European vacations, jaunts to the middle east, budget bills that approve wild spending and Presidential Primary politics that it's easy to forget sometimes that there's still a battle raging in Lansing not over how much the Democrats are going to raise our taxes but over how much we can responsibly cut and reform in state government to make sure taxpayers get their money's worth.
There's a great op-ed piece in this morning's Detroit News that paints quite the picture in one area that's already garnered a bit of public attention but still hasn't received demonstrable action in the legislature. The issue of public school employee benefits. In a special to the News, Mike Reno, a trustee at the Rochester Community Schools takes the debate a step further than what's typically discussed on the subject. While political observers now know that the state could save somewhere in the neighborhood of $200 million a year just by sourcing the way we purchase insurance differently, Reno argues that moving public teacher benefits in line with the best the private sector has to offer wouldn't only provide significant further savings, but it'd be the only way to respect parents and taxpayers. Read on...
His preference is a move to a 401(k) type program, like most in the private sector (and state employees) and that school boards should adopt some changes in co-pays and deductibles to restore a little fiscal sanity to our kids' districts. Because the way things are going, we're not only out of step with the private sector, we're out of step with the rest of the nation. According to the piece:
And when you break it down a little further...
Clearly this is still going to be a tough one for the legislature to tackle. Any time you deal with benefits you open yourself up to the charge that you're attacking employees or that you're mean or that you just don't really care about people or that you're not serious about education or that you hate teachers or that... well... you get the point. But when we're talking about a billion dollars being spent above and beyond what other states are spending for the same service that's called an outlier. And there's a lot of room there for change without even removing our best-in-class status. Will it make the MEA happy? Yeah, no. But state Reps and Senators aren't elected to serve the MEA. They're elected to serve the voters and the taxpayers and with numbers like these it's clear there's a disconnect. Compare these benefits to private sector benefits and it's even more pronounced. The state spends 25% MORE to provide health-care benefits alone, according to a Michigan benefit-consulting group. That's not competitive. And with a budget deficit over a billion dollars we can't afford it. Keep best-in-class. Continue to provide better for our great educators than the other states. Just add a little sanity to the approach. Please. Sanity's something that's severely lacking these days. Look no further than Mark Brewer's boy John Edwards' statement a couple days ago that he'd tell people they weren't allowed to drive SUV's, regulating away the Big 3's most profitable vehicles and throwing a good-sized monkey wrench into their comeback efforts. Not what they need as performance reports start to emerge from the last quarter, indicating Chrysler didn't perform as well as they had. According to the Associated Press:
Sell them while you can, boys. There's an entire political party out there gunning for you and every manufacturing job in Michigan. And speaking of their leader, Edward's buddy Geoff Fieger is in the news again today and probably will be every day until his case is resolved. Yesterday wasn't that day, despite his best efforts. The FREEP reports:
Fieger's motion and the brief supporting it was 31 pages and included another 100 plus pages of exhibits. Fieger's legal team is drafting a request today asking the court for permission to exceed the 20 page limit, said Thomas Cranmer, one of Fieger's lawyers. One-hundred-thirty-one pages. Instead of twenty. In a motion to dismiss the charges. Sounds like Geoff was trying to argue the entire case in the motion phase. Fieger-time finds himself under a pretty serious indictment for illegally funneling $127,000 into the Edwards for President campaign. Serious charges. So Edwards returned the cash, right? Oh, right, sorry. He refuses to return the cash. But the Democrat establishment is up in arms over this gross ethical violation. They take money laundering and federal indictments seriously. And they've got LOTS to say. Here's a sampling of Dem response to Edward's refusal to hand over the money at the center of the massive federal investigation. Democrat National Committee: crickets chirping Michigan Democrat Party: crickets chirping Democrat POTUS Candidates: crickets chirping Regressisphere: crickets chirping Huh... aren't these same groups all up in arms over every single alleged ethical violation (even when it isn't illegal, like Fieger-time's money laundering) in the GOP? Well, at least they're consistent in their inconsistency.
A little spending sanity please? | 6 comments (6 topical, 0 hidden)
A little spending sanity please? | 6 comments (6 topical, 0 hidden)
|
|