Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed




  • RightMichigan.com

    Twitter Feed

    Governor Granholm, House Representatives Brenda Clack and Steve Tobocman Dishonor Michigan Families


    By AChildsRight, Section News
    Posted on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 01:51:36 AM EST
    Tags: (all tags)

    Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm, Michigan House Representatives Brenda Clack and Steve Tobocman Dishonor Michigan Families and Children.

    On Saturday, August 18, 2007, a national rally was held in Washington, DC in honor of Family Preservation Day.    
    To commemorate this special day, a resolution was introduced in the State House of Representatives on August 8 by Rep. Glenn Steil.  This resolution, HR 162, had bi-partisan support, with ten Democrats joining nineteen Republicans as co-sponsors.

    HR 162 failed, because it was passed to Rep. Brenda Clack's Family and Children's Services Committee, and she declined to respond to requests to take up the resolution.  House Democrat Floor Leader Steve Tobocman refused requests that HR 162 be "discharged to the floor", which would free it from the committee process, and free it up for immediate discussion and a vote.

    Democratic Floor Leader Tobocman's office repeatedly stated the resolution was only about joint custody (in a divorce/separation matter), and would not discharge it to the floor.  Tobocman's largest problem was that the date of the rally was put in the resolution, so to pass the resolution would be to endorse the rally.

    Following is the wording for House Resolution 162:

         A resolution commemorating August 18, 2007, as Family Preservation Day in the state of Michigan.
         Whereas, We recognize that the interconnected relationships fostered in families are essential to our state's stability, growth and quality of life; and
         Whereas, The strength of our nation today is dependant on the strength of the family structure; and
         Whereas, The preservation of the family unit will bring about the benefits of ongoing parental relationships, which include, but are not limited to, a declining rate of juvenile crime and childhood poverty and an increased rate of childhood self esteem and family-value awareness; and
         Whereas, Family Preservation Day is an opportunity for government to join forces with parents, children, community organizations and local agencies to advocate on behalf of our children, and to take action together against the destruction of the family structure; now, therefore, be it
         Resolved by the House of Representatives, That the members of this legislative body commemorate August 18, 2007, as Family Preservation Day in the state of Michigan.

    HR 162 makes no mention of joint child custody.  Naturally the date of the DC Rally was in the resolution-they were the same date!  The DC Rally and HR 162 were just two segments of the Family Preservation Day celebration!

    Not only did HR 162 fail, so too did a request to Governor Granholm to issue a special proclamation to recognize and honor August 18 as Family Preservation Day.  Not even a simple acknowledgment was received on the proclamation requests!

    Here are three serious and very clear examples of how the state's Democratic leaders feel about the families of our state.  For them not to be able or willing to set aside one single day with a small bit of fanfare to honor Michigan families and to encourage their preservation speaks volumes.

    There is yet another serious example of this leadership arrogance and complete disregard toward Michigan families and their children.  Rep. Brenda Clack is also refusing to allow House Bill 4564, The Equal Parenting Bill, up in "her" committee for discussion, hearings, and vote.  There are eight other committee members-four Republicans and four Democrats.  Why is such an important bill being "held hostage"?  The Equal Parenting Bill would finally begin to form Michigan's custody laws into being what is truly "in the best interests of the child" and not the antiquted 1970s law which harms families and children.

    < Chairman Anuzis on Legislative Approval of Joint January 15th Primary | Term limits on the ballot 1/15 too? --AND-- What happened to Dem "reform" mantra? >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    Granholm, Tobacman and Clack (none / 0) (#1)
    by when will they ever learn on Fri Sep 07, 2007 at 06:30:00 AM EST
    These three are not interested in preserving the family.  That should be quite evident in the fact that Michigan is number one in the nation for Terminating parental rights and is 7th in the nation for taking children into foster care where they are raped, beaten, burned, and starved.  

    National average for reunification with parents is 76% of children taken.  Michigan's reunification rate is 29%.  From that I guess we are to believe that Michigan parents are more abusive than in any other state in this nation.  Does this sound right.  Or is Michigan just looking for more Title IV Social Security funds.  

    I guess they like that Michigan is number 1 at something other than unemployment

    Follow The Money (none / 0) (#2)
    by yearling on Mon Sep 10, 2007 at 04:40:52 PM EST
    Follow The Money

    The DHS collects federal dollars for each child in foster care.  It also gets bonus federal dollars when those children are adopted.  It doesn't get those dollars when it doesn't take kids from their parents or when it returns them to their parents.  See US Code, Title 42, Chapter 7, Subchapter IV, Part E.

    http://uscode.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sup_01_42_10_7_20_IV_30_E.html

    Under Michigan Supreme Court rulings (sorry, I don't have those in front of me), both parents must pay child support as if they were the non-custodial parent for a child in foster care, even if the amount they pay is more than the cost to the state of housing their child.  The state can make a profit!

    Michigan Courts also get paid by the Federal Government for collecting those child support dollars for the state of Michigan under US Code Title IV-D.

    The Federal Government pays the court 66 cents for every dollar the court spends on child support collections (US Code Title 42, Section 655), and the federal government provides additional incentive payments (US Code Title 42 Section 658a) based on various child support collection criteria.  It's my understanding that these incentive payments, along with Grants to States for Access and Visitation (US Code Title 42 Section 669b)  combine with fees fully pay for Friend of the Court.

    http://uscode.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sup_01_42_10_7_20_IV_30_D.html

    So it pays for the DHS and courts to work hand in hand to take children from parents and see that they are kept in foster care for a while, then adopted to their foster parents.

    Oh, also, I believe that adopted children through foster care can still get medicines and whatnot paid for by the state, which is one factor that might encourage the DHS to find ways of labeling kids as having problems.  I suspect, but I'm not sure, that the adoptive parents may also get direct payments even after adoption for providing care such as driving them to appointments, etc.  

    I think that it was the case with Ricky Holland that his adoptive mother and father were taking him to see a state sponsored Psychiatrist, who IIRC, didn't do anything when Ricky kept hitting himself in his office.

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Join the RightMichigan.com Facebook Group HERE!
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search