Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed




  • RightMichigan.com

    Twitter Feed

    True test of a candidate: Can you convince 55% of voters to support you if given no other choice?


    By Nick, Section News
    Posted on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 06:33:47 AM EST
    Tags: (all tags)

    The votes have all been counted and the dust is beginning to settle.  And as far as the left is concerned it's time to let the spin begin!  As you read your local paper today expect to find stories about an exultant Hillary Clinton, thrilled Hillary supporters and activists and her momentum heading into South Carolina and the casino-caucuses in Nevada.  Remember that the Clinton machine is one built upon an almost other-worldly (apologies to Dem hero Denny Kucinich) ability to spin (no, I don't mean like a UFO).  But as you read all of that don't jump too quickly over the reports of the final voting tallies.

    Once the dust settled Hillary Clinton took Michigan by outpolling "Uncommitted" 55 to 40!  

    In a primary in which everyone knew going to the ballot-box that they could pick Hillary or nobody 236,723 Michigan Democrats went to the polls, took a Dem primary and checked the box for the phantom stranger.  Watching her performance as the night went along was like watching a stone sink.  First she was at 70, then it was 67.  66.  65.  62.  55?!  

    Oh, but that's not shocking.  Except that it is.  Talk about barely escaping with your life.  Or, if you're a Hillary stalwart talk about how great it is that you can convince 55% of the people to vote for you if they have no other choice.  

    Read on...

    Exhibit 1, the Detroit News:

    Some political analysts said Clinton could only claim a convincing victory here if she polled more than 60 percent, since she was the only leading candidate on the ballot. But Clinton backers rejected that notion.

    Former Michigan Gov. James Blanchard, a leading proponent for Clinton in Michigan, said he was "ecstatic" about the results.

    "This is a nice springboard to win Michigan in November," Blanchard said. "Anything above 50 (percent) I'd be happy with...

    David Rohde, political science professor at Duke University, said the exit poll numbers indicate Clinton met expectations.

    "If uncommitted wins, it doesn't look so good. But this result doesn't mean much," said Rohde, who specializes in presidential elections. "It's hard to sell as anything more than what was expected."

    So Jennifer Granholm's BFF expected that she'd barely squeeze out a win against a ghost.  Got it.  Keep shining that stuff, guys.  Maybe eventually someone will buy it.  And about that springboard into winning Michigan in November, that's not all that likely if Clinton continues to flip Michigan the bird and avoid us like we have some sort of economic plague (call it granholmanddillonacacus).  And that's not just me talking.  From the mouth of the left, the Ivory Tower

    (Kimberly) Emmert, 51, of Linden said she always has voted Democratic but planned to vote for Mitt Romney in the Republican primary. She's miffed that there was little choice on the Democratic primary ballot.

    And she said she won't vote Democratic in November, either.

    "I believe we should have representation, and I believe my vote should count. And I don't think it will with the Democrats," said Emmert, a glassblower artist. "I can't imagine any Democratic voter would allow the party to exclude them from the electoral process..."

    (Debbie Dingell) said Republican candidates now have set the bar to discuss issues that affect the auto industry -- and the Democratic nominee will have to do likewise.

    "Democrats are going to have to fight for Michigan. They can't take Michigan for granted now," Dingell said.

    Too late for that I'm afraid.  They've been taking us for granted for the last half-year while Republican candidates have swarmed the State repeatedly.  

    Folks like Kimberly Emmert give me some small ray of hope in all of this lefty darkness.  I was seriously starting to wonder whether or not there was a single Democrat in the State who was willing to put Michigan before their personal partisan political hackery.  If the FREEP is willing to identify one there've got to be more, right?  Maybe not many more, though.

    We know there aren't any in the House Democrat caucus or on staff with the Dems.  The State is good enough to provide a paycheck but apparently it's not good enough to defend at the ballot box.  Plus on election day you can just skip work and head out to the polls in another city to attempt to intimidate voters.  

    The Grand Rapids Press has coverage of yesterday's reported shenanigans by Dem central staffers.  

    John Taratuta, 47, of Grand Rapids, the owner of Taratuta School of Truck Driving, said he was leaving his polling place at Fuller Avenue and Three Mile Road NE at 9 a.m. today and was headed across the street to sign the petition when two men and a woman "intercepted" him.

    They debated with him over taxes, he said, then took his photograph. One of the men identified himself as a member of Dean's staff, he said.

    "It was borderline intimidation," Taratuta said. He said he signed the petition...

    Dean said none of them were members of his staff. Their job, he said, was to inform, not to intimidate. "The fact is, there's a lot of misinformation going out," Dean said, who added he wasn't aware they were taking photographs of petition signers.

    But what, no condemnation from Dean for the intimidation tactics?  Shoving a camera into a voter's face while he or she signs a legal petition is galling and is certainly one serious form of intimidation.  Imagine for a moment that it's election day 2008 and Republicans showed up to the polls in Detroit armed with cameras.  Now imagine that as every voter approached the building one of these Republicians jumped in their way, started yelling at them and put a camera in their face snapping a photograph.

    Sounds like a recipe for national guard deployment, doesn't it?  That sort of behavior would be tolerated for approximately five seconds before the blocker wound up beaten to a pulp, arrested or both.  

    The Democrats?  They come to Grand Rapids and do the exact same thing and it's no skin off Dean's nose.  Not a word of condemnation or even concern for the integrity of the process.

    And there I go expecting consistency again.  Someday I'll learn to suppress that particular urge.

    < Michigan goes for Romney and Clinton (with under 65%?!) | Wednesday in the Sphere, January 16 >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    Mixed Feelings (none / 0) (#1)
    by Phillydilly on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 07:07:59 AM EST
    On one hand, I'm thrilled to see Michigan Democrats came out to vote uncommitted. I don't remember or even know if there were projections on what Hillary would take against uncommitted, but I have to believe 55% is a huge disappointment.
    On the other hand, I'm irrate at the DNC/other Dem candidates. It is so blatantly obvious that if Obama would have campaigned here he would have buried Clinton.

    • Agree 100% by Nick, 01/16/2008 07:11:16 AM EST (none / 0)
      • A Blue State by Ed Burley, 01/16/2008 12:34:21 PM EST (none / 0)
    Misinformation? (none / 0) (#3)
    by DMOnline on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 08:55:47 AM EST
    What "misinformation" is Dean referring to?

    True or False:  Robert Dean voted to raise our taxes.

    Answer: True.

    The truth doesn't get much simpler than that.

    What a bunch of anti-democratic thugs Dean employs.  This "incident" of organized intimidation normally reserved for 3rd world banana republics tells us a great deal about Mr. Dean.

    It's time for him and his ilk to go.

    DMOnline
    www.RightCuz.com


    Uncommitted (none / 0) (#5)
    by moderateme on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 12:35:08 PM EST
    I was thrilled to see so many dems vote uncommitted.  It's about time they give the finger to their leadership that keeps stripping them of a real primary.  I don't like them voting in ours either.

    So? (none / 0) (#6)
    by NoviDemocrat on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 12:58:05 PM EST
    I'm not a Hillary supporter and didn't vote for her yesterday. But yesterday's numbers tell us nothing about how she would have done if all of the candidates had been on the ballot. 40% didn't vote for her. So what? For those of us who vote in every election, we're going to select someone. Since Obama and Edwards weren't on the ballot, uncommitted was their option to pick to show their support for those candidates.

    If uncommitted had gotten 60% of the vote, it would have been inline with the actual polling of candidate support in the state. All this BS about what percentage Hillary should have gotten in just more garbage from the right who will use every opportunity to attack her.

    Most irritating.. (none / 0) (#7)
    by rdww on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 03:04:39 PM EST
    ... is the way the media, both state and national, is ignoring Hillary's inability to make the sale to 45% of state Dems.

    It's my understanding (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by Mark Adams on Wed Jan 16, 2008 at 11:51:22 PM EST
    "(Kimberly) Emmert, 51, of Linden said she always has voted Democratic but planned to vote for Mitt Romney in the Republican primary"
    My wife got an email from the DNC that urged Dems supporters to vote for Mitt, to keep the Rep pool filled and in disarray so the infighting will continue with in the GOP.
    I asked her to write back to the DNC and ask them how the infighting with Clinton and Obama was going.

    LMAO!

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Join the RightMichigan.com Facebook Group HERE!
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search