Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed




  • RightMichigan.com

    Twitter Feed

    Tuesday in the Sphere, March 18


    By Nick, Section News
    Posted on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 08:08:27 AM EST
    Tags: (all tags)

    RougBlog: Sex Predators Collecting Education Dollars

    Tim's Blog (Congressman Walberg): Outrage with SBA Decision

    Life Beat: Michigan Senate Passes Parental Consent Revisions

    The Peters Report: BREAKING: Gary Peters Caught Campaigning on Campus

    Republican Ranting: Michigan Should Not Re-Do It's Primary; Democrats Agree

    < Congressional races taking shape while Granholm / Cherry tie a steak around State's neck | Guns and Liberty >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    re: peters (none / 0) (#1)
    by whatever on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 08:59:03 AM EST
    while i don't know peters nor am i condoning his position at cmu, in the senate, or wherever, i will say there is this thing called "academic freedom" in the classroom.

    the class here was clearly on break. peters during the class break provided his OPINION on a particular on-campus group--which he has every right to do. i hope you would agree (quite scary if you don't).

    the other stuff? go for it. but your headline in this particular case in regards to this particular and specific situation is misleading and makes a mountain out of something that isn't even a mole hill.

    add it up (none / 0) (#5)
    by neutralobserver on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 10:34:18 AM EST
    say what you want, but there is enough questions now based on recent events at cmu to say gary peters is campaigning on campus and is misusing his professorship. you can't 'campaign on campus'

    Absurd (none / 0) (#8)
    by reagangoldwater on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 12:21:07 PM EST
    Give me a break. So a professor could stand outside the door and use racist language and not get in trouble? Please.

    • I disagree by Ed Burley, 03/18/2008 03:06:16 PM EST (none / 0)
    scary (none / 0) (#10)
    by whatever on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 02:10:03 PM EST
    i understand wanting to nail peters, but this SPECIFIC incident isn't one worth slinging arrows over. it's tame. it's lame. there's nothing to it. nada. get over it. move on. accept it.

    until there is such a time when we can program robots to subjectively spew out data and facts without any bias or emotion whatsoever, i guess we'll have to begrudingly put up with human teachers and begrudingly allow them to have personal opionions. lol...

    correction (none / 0) (#11)
    by whatever on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 02:11:52 PM EST
    meant to say "program robots...OBJECTIVELY," not subjectively.

    where is line? (none / 0) (#12)
    by neutralobserver on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 02:24:51 PM EST
    what does peters have to do before he's fired? it's clear he doesn't have the best interests of his students and cmu at heart.

    nice way to support free speech (none / 0) (#14)
    by whatever on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 04:18:26 PM EST
    that's a nice way to support free speech, ed ("shut the hell up!")

    i'm glad you've spent time in a college classroom as a student. i've spent time there as both student and instructor.

    hate to break it to those of you getting shorts in knots here, but teachers have a right to express personal opinions in the classroom. now: if teachers are saying "it's my way or the highway" or intimidating students or grading them according to if they align with the teachers philosophy of life, that's wrong and is grounds for students to take action.

    but i have yet to see evidence in this specific case any of that happened.

    don't be so hell bent to get at peters that you trample the constitution in your zealous haste to slap him.

    good grief. breath deep. exhale. please.

    question (none / 0) (#15)
    by whatever on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 04:50:59 PM EST
    it's also not clear whether these students, during break, asked peters for his opinion. i assume the students that reported this were the two (or one from the two) that were in the classroom during the break (?) and if they dutifully reported the incident it sounds like they have an agenda to begin with...which makes this entire specific episode rather questionable as per the claim the headline is making.

    again, i'm not supporting peters. there seems to be enough meat in the entire situation, enough to question, without having to really go out on a limb and stretch on this one particular situation. doing so damages the credibility of those going after peters--not the other way around.

    i mean, just a few days ago there was a link to a story showing peters walking down stairs at cmu and headline (if i remember right) chiding him for not answering questions. today he apparently responds to some students during a break in class and he's a bad guy for that. make up your minds!

    Whatever (none / 0) (#16)
    by Ed Burley on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 06:46:16 PM EST
    Gee, I guess all the time I spent earning my Masters degree doesn't count for anything when it comes to the all wise Whatever. He has expressed his personal opinion in class, all the while allowing all of us little people to share our opinions.

    Look Donut-Man, let me put it straight to you. I have 3 adopted African-American children, two bi-racial foster children, an adopted Hispanic White, and 3 biological Hispanic-Whites, AND an African-American son-in-law who I introduced to my daughter (he was a co-worker, and I thought he was a great guy). But, with all that, I was told, in no uncertain terms, that I was a RACIST - simply because I was born with peach colored skin - er, "white" skin.

    When I objected, I was told that my denial proved that I was a racist. I couldn't help it. ALL white people are racists. That's the fact, and there's no way around it. Now, as a white racist, I have two choices: remain a racist, OR be a racist trying to "change the system."

    There was no debate allowed; only condemnation. The professor's 3 graduate assistants included an African-American woman who insisted that, no matter what, I was a racist. The white homosexual professor (and before you jump on me, he wore his orientation on his sleeve, openly talking about it, and condemning ALL heterosexuals as homophobic) and the two white lesbian grad students both admitted to being racists who were trying to change the system.

    Does that sound like free and open exchange of ideas? Does that sound like "free speech"? Hardly. It sounds like "my way or the highway." It's the way it is in grad school in the state universities. The few professors that allow you to speak your mind have read, and agree with, Horowitz's book about the Liberal, and dangerous, professors.

    ed


    • re: ed by whatever, 03/18/2008 08:41:59 PM EST (none / 0)
    and as a follow up (none / 0) (#18)
    by whatever on Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 08:44:25 PM EST
    the situation you describe isn't acceptable. doesn't matter if it's a liberal doing it or a conservative.

    painting entire populations with a single brush because of your personal negative experience isn't the answer, either. i'm sorry you had to go through that. that is indeed bs.

    he should answer (none / 0) (#21)
    by neutralobserver on Wed Mar 19, 2008 at 02:27:37 PM EST
    peters should explain himself and answer questions

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Join the RightMichigan.com Facebook Group HERE!
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search