![]() |
NAVIGATION
|
Your New Scoop SiteWelcome to Scoop! To help you figure things out, there is a Scoop Admin Guide which can hopefully answer most of your questions. Some tips:
For support, questions, and general help with Scoop, email support@scoophost.com ScoopHost.com is currently running Scoop version Undeterminable from . |
Tag: HB4111By JGillman, Section News
During the lead up to yesterday's nail-biter, I reached out to some of Michigan's State Senators on the issue of HB4111.
"The Senator is exploring other options with regard to potential legislative action that would offer free-market alternatives to a federal or state-federal partnership exchange so the state will have something to fall back on should the provisions of Obamacare be unmanageable or unenforceable."My sentiments exactly. Its likely that without the state capitulating, there is NO way the federal exchanges can work. The infrastructure would have to be built completely from scratch, and would be unworkable for many years. This allows the weight of such an effort to fall on itself, and no state money or resources need to be involved. Expanding freedoms (as that statement suggests) for the insurance offerings in Michigan could do wonders. De-regulating with safety devices built in can make a better product available and cut free some of the innovation as yet unseen.
But until the state is willing to exercise it's 10th amendment authority, its won't happen. All of the best efforts would make it even harder for Obamacare to work, and by "work" I mean destroy health care as we know it. I commend the Senator on his willingness to provide a fallback position for the citizens of Michigan. By Corinthian Scales, Section News
Now, a brief word from the drab rumpled blazer, and tieless blue oxford shirt.
Rick, forgot to clearly state his main premise of the Big C - crony capitalism. OABTW, Governerd, I will allow you to call this taxpaying citizen a "customer" when I have the choice of not having my money taken by force, and the option of spending it on a better value than your intrusive, growing government bureaucracy dependent upon more coercion. (7 comments) Comments >> By JGillman, Section News
"I'll take Obamacare for $31 million, Alex"
Answer: "the performance by a public official of an act that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to law" ... Think think think Question: What is malfeasance? .. Cha-ching! I wonder if our state senators are as willing to face primaries and an angered base like our reps?
As for Reagan's "The person who agrees with you 80 percent of the time is a friend and an ally -- not a 20 percent traitor", allow this image to put the proper perspective on it. ![]() (4 comments) Comments >> By JGillman, Section News
Oh for Pete's sake.
We've been here before, except our Republicans were actually fighting the unknown aspects of the new socialism coming from Washington. Now our governor is acting as a conduit of liberties being taken from us, and there are even willing accomplices which we had not expected. This never should have been allowed out of committee, and it it wasn't for the compromised position that Jase Bolger put himself in (Roy Schmidt), it wouldn't even be coming up for a vote.
This was posted on Facebook. It is reportedly a discussion between Norm Hughes and Michigan State Representative Martin Howrylak:
OK, tie it up, because we need to get to the bottom of this first.How can a grant be classified? And how could ANYONE even think of voting for something without reviewing it completely? If this is true, we have a bigger problem than just this one item of malfeasance. Every damned one of those legislators better have a grasp on what they are loading up on Michiganders. As it is, we will spend the next year recruiting candidates up and down the state especially for primaries of non term limited cretins who vote for this thing without understanding what you are actually taking from us. I have independently verified there is a communication rift between the feds and our legislators with regard to this. This from one who will likely vote FOR the measure: "We have requested from HHS a copy of the federal docs for review and our requests have been ignored."Isn't that special? CALL NOW!! quid est consequentia segnitiae? (10 comments) Comments >> |
External FeedsMetro/State News RSS from The Detroit News+ Judge McCree: 'I lusted after that woman' + Former top Detroit library official charged with taking $1.4M in bribes + Windsor plastics fire creates plume of smoke visible from Detroit + Romney campaign intern facing cyber-stalking charge in Detroit + Detroit City Council approves hiring of new top lawyer + Taylor man found guilty in deaths outside Porky's Bikini Bar in Pontiac + High winds, rain expected to roll through Metro Detroit + Former airport CEO Mullin seeks $113K more in lawsuit + Michigan Traveling Vietnam Wall on display in Royal Oak through Thursday + SUV on railroad tracks stops Amtrak for 2 hours + Michigan to launch school violence hotline + Police: Woman dead, 2 men wounded in shooting in Detroit + Michigan man heads to trial in 2012 death of infant son + Boats linked to 2010 Lake Huron oil spill being removed + Barricaded gunman found dead in Detroit's Corktown Politics RSS from The Detroit News + Lawmakers push state to make sure pet coke piles are safe + Michigan to launch school violence hotline + Automakers, dealers object to rental recall bill + Hathaway lawyer pleads case to keep her out of prison; feds want her to serve 12-18 months + Panel: Apple uses firms outside U.S. to avoid taxes + Officials: Senators reach deal on high-tech visas + Ex-IRS chief: Can't say how tea party targeting happened + Detroit state reps unveil no-fault auto insurance reform plan + Peters names campaign manager for Senate bid + Obama aides knew of IRS audit, say he wasn't told + Senators: Require fingerprinting of foreigners at 30 airports + Trump to headline Oakland County GOP dinner tonight + Michigan Republicans seek new limits on welfare aid + Tea party looks to seize on White House controversies + Michigan cancer patients to back Medicaid expansion Front Page
Thursday May 16th
Wednesday May 15th
Tuesday May 14th
Monday May 13th
|