Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Your New Scoop Site

    Welcome to Scoop!

    To help you figure things out, there is a Scoop Admin Guide which can hopefully answer most of your questions.

    Some tips:

    • Most of the layout is changed in "Blocks", found in the admin tools menu
    • Features can be turned on and off, and configured, in "Site Controls" in the admin tools menu
    • Stories have an "edit" link right beside the "Full Story" link on an index page, and right beside the "Post a Comment" link on the full story page. They can also be edited by clicking the story title in the "Story List" admin tool
    • Boxes are what allow you to write new features for Scoop; they require a knowledge of the perl programming language to work with effectively, although you can often make small changes without knowing much perl. If you would like a feature added but cannot program it yourself, ScoopHost does custom Scoop programming as one of its services.
    • If you aren't sure where to look for a particular feature or piece of display, try the "Search Admin Tools" link in the admin tools menu.

    For support, questions, and general help with Scoop, email support@scoophost.com

    ScoopHost.com is currently running Scoop version Undeterminable from .

    Tag: decennial census

    The Real Eleventh Amendment


    By Kevin Rex Heine, Section News
    Posted on Thu Jul 12, 2012 at 06:21:51 PM EST
    Tags: Electoral College, presidential elections, Congressional Apportionment Amendment, Article the First, Apportionment Act of 1911, Reapportionment Act of 1929, Apportionment Act of 1941, U. S. House of Representatives, decennial census, apportionment methodology, LaVergne v Bryson et al - Docket # 12-1171, U. S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, potentially Amendment XXVIII (all tags)

    What do you do with a duly ratified amendment to the U. S. Constitution that has not actually been added to the Constitution?  What do you do if that amendment potentially renders unconstitutional a long-standing federal statute (that has been in place for about 91 years)?  What do you do if that amendment, which was properly ratified 220 years ago, may have prevented the federal statute in question from having been enacted in the first place?


    (2 comments, 1535 words in story) Full Story



    Advertise on RightMichigan.com

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!

    External Feeds

    Metro/State News RSS from The Detroit News
    + Misconduct hearing under way for Wayne County judge
    + Lawyer: Saudi Arabia supports man arrested with pressure cooker
    + GM launching summer program for Detroit-area students
    + Mom rejects son charged with child porn allegations in bizarre case
    + Neal Rubin: Study says Detroit is a great departure city — which counts as an honor, sort of
    + Detroit girl, 3, returned to family after overnight search
    + AAA: Michigan gas prices rise 10 cents over past week
    + Department of Human Services worker pleads guilty in welfare fraud case
    + Police get high-priority tips in search for Norton Shores gas station clerk
    + Wayne County Circuit Judge McCree faces fight for reputation, career
    + Michigan aims to expand education for inmates
    + Buena Vista teachers to return to classrooms Monday
    + Officials to kick off Michigan seat belt campaign
    + State tries to ease load on Michigan's foster care system
    + Royal Oak club off the hook after customer falls, hits bar

    Politics RSS from The Detroit News
    + Michigan Republicans seek new limits on welfare aid
    + Tea party looks to seize on White House controversies
    + Michigan cancer patients to back Medicaid expansion
    + Senators working on immigration bill agree to tighten asylum controls
    + Supreme Court to weigh in on legislative prayers
    + AP CEO calls records seizure unconstitutional
    + Michigan disabled vets could see property tax relief
    + White House insists Obama was not involved in IRS
    + Obama to speak on legality of drone program
    + Tea party looks to take advantage of moment
    + Emails show Snyder aides aware of 'skunk works' group
    + Mich. Rep. Camp: IRS lied, must clean house
    + Military to re-train leaders on sexual assault prevention
    + Organic food companies gain Washington clout
    + GOP hopes IRS scandal will snag health care law

    create account | faq | search