Your New Scoop Site

Welcome to Scoop!

To help you figure things out, there is a Scoop Admin Guide which can hopefully answer most of your questions.

Some tips:

Most of the layout is changed in "Blocks", found in the admin tools menu
Features can be turned on and off, and configured, in "Site Controls" in the admin tools menu
Stories have an "edit" link right beside the "Full Story" link on an index page, and right beside the "Post a Comment" link on the full story page. They can also be edited by clicking the story title in the "Story List" admin tool
Boxes are what allow you to write new features for Scoop; they require a knowledge of the perl programming language to work with effectively, although you can often make small changes without knowing much perl. If you would like a feature added but cannot program it yourself, ScoopHost does custom Scoop programming as one of its services.
If you aren't sure where to look for a particular feature or piece of display, try the "Search Admin Tools" link in the admin tools menu.

For support, questions, and general help with Scoop, email support@scoophost.com

ScoopHost.com is currently running Scoop version Undeterminable from .

Tag: elections have consequences

Humpday Divertere - Spiking The Football

By JGillman, Section Multimedia
Posted on Wed Sep 19, 2012 at 08:49:47 AM EST
Tags: I did that, Military, Seal Team 6, O-Brother, Elections have consequences (all tags)

In between posts right now. Some big stuff coming up.

In the meantime we'll just keep reminding folks what a self serving donkey this guy is. He has been no friend to Michigan, no friend to our economy, and no friend to our military.

Video below the fold

(56 words in story) Full Story

Dissecting a Coffeehouse Combination

By Kevin Rex Heine, Section News
Posted on Thu Jul 05, 2012 at 06:45:55 PM EST
Tags: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, NFIB v. Sebelius (11-393), HHS v. Florida (11-398), Florida v. HHS (11-400), Individual Mandate, Medicaid Expansion, Commerce Clause, Necessary and Proper Clause, Taxing and Spending Powers, Tenth Amendment, separation of powers, checks and balances, elections have consequences, Anti-Injunction Act, shared responsibility payment, severability (all tags)

I think that, prior to last weekend, most everyone reasonable was expecting that the Supreme Court was going to rule both the Individual Mandate and the Medicaid Expansion of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act an unconstitutional overreach of Congress' enumerated powers, specifically with regard to the Commerce Clause, the Necessary and Proper Clause, and perhaps even the Tenth Amendment. The only question would then become whether or not severability (or lack thereof) would give SCOTUS the necessary leverage to send Barry Obama's "signature achievement" down in flames. (That latter result seems to have been clearly anticipated by Speaker Boehner's "don't spike the ball" memo from 21 June.) But then, at around 10:07 a.m., on 28 June 2012, . . . well, we'll get to that.

To say that in the immediate aftermath opinions have varied as to what, exactly, John G. Roberts, jr., 17th Chief Justice of the United States, was thinking when he sided with the four hardcore liberals on the court in upholding the individual mandate (albeit as a tax) is probably an understatement. Yes, I absolutely agree with those who hold that Chief Roberts should have sided with the other four conservative associates (Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito) and eviscerated BHO's signature achievement, thus officially rendering his first year in office a complete waste of time. However, having taken the time to dissect the opinion as best as my non-legal expertise will provide, I'm rather inclined to believe that Chief Roberts is a masterful chess player, at least politically. As to why I think that way . . . well, let's go below the fold and discuss that.

In advance, I should probably warn you that this is going to get a bit lengthy, so you might find a fresh pot of coffee useful. This also may require more than one read-through, for the same reason.

(8 comments, 9076 words in story) Full Story

A Message To Our Legislators - Beware False Choices

Is the next order to take a shower, just don't use water?

By Corinthian Scales, Section News
Posted on Thu May 17, 2012 at 03:28:20 PM EST
Tags: Anyone but Stabenow, NObama, Eric Holder DoJ, Clinton Judicial Appointments, Senate confirmations, Don't be sayin King Kwame aloud, Elections have consequences, What's Woronchak protecting? (all tags)

From the y'all ain't gonna believe this one section of The Detroit News

Former Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick's name is so toxic a federal judge blocked prosecutors from mentioning it Thursday during the $12 million bid-rigging trial of contractor Bobby Ferguson.
U.S. District Judge David Lawson was concerned the mere mention of Kilpatrick's name would be prejudicial against Ferguson, the former mayor's close friend. Instead, Kilpatrick was identified as a "city official" in front of the jury.
It was the latest instance of the former mayor's shadow looming over the bid-rigging trial, which is focusing on contracts awarded during Kilpatrick's tenure. The jury selection process took six days, an inordinately long time as lawyers individually questioned jurors about their feelings toward Kilpatrick, who is not on trial in the case.
Rest here

Associations matter, Judgy Wudgy. That's something for RINO turned Democrat Woronchak, to think about too.

(4 comments) Comments >>